Patiently waiting for ArmchairStrategy's write up of why this win doesn't mean anything because of poor substitutions, and/or why Fesenko is better than Jefferson.
Well, Jefferson was worse than Fesenko in the first half (facilitated by Jefferson setting the bar very low--i.e., negative--and Fesenko not playing the first half). The key difference is that AJ gets two quarters to figure things out, and Fes gets two minutes.
And Elson gets four (although he normally gets 8 to 12 overall).
Kudos to Sloan for actually putting Bell on the bench where he belongs--after 34 minutes of neutral-impact play, anyway. The decision to play Elder Hayward in his place, however, seems driven by delirium or randomness--not that Miles was particularly stellar tonight, either.
As has been typical, though, Sloan didn't trust the second string--not that the first string deserved his devotion. Not just ignoring the historical success of Fesenko as part of EW-RP-CJ-FE-KF (such obliviousness has been commonplace in recent games); but also sitting down Price and Elson each after 4 minutes, which ended up putting AJ in foul trouble toward the end of the game, as he picked up a foul or two (and a TO or two) in Q2. If Minny had somehow come back, then poor foul management by Sloan would've rendered the starting frontcourt handicapped defensively.
And no, McFly, I see only partial satisfaction in the Jazz digging themselves a hole, again, largely from sluggish play from the starters, only to race back to an overwhelming win. Such inconsistency doesn't cut it against contenders, as Dallas and Miami and San Antonio (and the first Denver game) have shown. Sloan hasn't shown exclusivity in his non-pay-for-performance approach to achievement; Prices time actually went down. It'll be interesting to see if the Elder gets any love PT-wise after a solid effort tonight in clutch time.