c'mon, you know that scoring wings are easy to find than versatile power forwards with a 21+ PER. and anyway, what i'm talking about are wing players who score well but don't help their team much.
i did a query for post-3 point era wing players who had a rotation spot (>/= 20 mpg) and had 15 pp36 or greater but a WS of 5 or fewer on a season-long basis. some of them were incredible scorers: marc aguirre 1986, jim jackson 1995, eddie johnson 1993, chris mullin 1993, dell curry 1994, mitch ritchmond 1992... melo's on the list a number of times, so is vince carter and so is tmac. JR smith, don't-call-me-wes matthews, brandon roy. dunleavy, finley... i'm just giving you the most recognizable names, skipping a few dozen guys like bob sura or keith bogans. my point here is that burks could get pretty damn good on an individual level and still not make the jazz much better. history is full of examples of score-first wings that have little affect on the win total.
then i did a query for players at any position in the same era who has a PER of plus-20, at least 16 points, shooting percentage of at least .490, at least 1 steal per game, at least 8 rebounds per game. about 3-6 guys do it per year, here are some of the most recent. see if you can spot the duds in this group: dwight howard, lebron james, chris paul, dwyane wade, russell westbrook, manu ginobili, kobe bryant, carol butler (ok), allen iverson, gilbert arenas, baron davis, shawn marion.
short version: paul has the skill set of an elite player. burks (so far) has the skill set of a fairly dime-a-dozen player. i hope that changes and that burks proves himself beyond just an ability to score. as of right now, paul is more valuable.