I have a feeling this isn't the first time you've said this.
Truth be told, I was quoting your mom.
I have a feeling this isn't the first time you've said this.
It could be argued there's no right way to do this. I'm voting at a grade school level. I vote for whoever I "like" the least. Obviously, there's no scientific equation to quantify "like", hence there is no "right way"
Tough choice for me between Carroll, Evans, and Tinsley. Finally decided to order them like this (in order I'll vote for elimination): Tinsley, Carroll, Evans.
C'mon, give Tinsley a bit more credit than that. Segways are so last decade. Does anybody use them anymore after the owner of the company drove himself off a cliff in one? My bet is we see him in a hoveround doing some wicked spin moves.yep, it's carroll, the most replaceable guy on this roster. followed by evans, who is redundant on a roster deep with big men who actually have big bodies, and then tinsley who is probably going to parade around on a segueway next year.
Tough choice for me between Carroll, Evans, and Tinsley. Finally decided to order them like this (in order I'll vote for elimination): Tinsley, Carroll, Evans.
i agree that carroll, evans and tinsley represent the most expendable at this point, and i disagree that carroll proved anything to us last year.
after those three are gone, we're down to really our rotation guys: foye, williams, williams, burks, kanter, jefferson, millsap, hayward, favors. that's when it's going to be a lot of fun.
So why don't we just vote all of those three off and get down to the fun stuff?
So why don't we just vote all of those three off and get down to the fun stuff?
Because UGLI (and others) will vote for Jefferson every round until he's gone.
We should make the next round a top 3 round. Everyone gets three votes and the top 3 vote getters are gone.