What's new

Utah's Illegal Immigrant List

The Thriller

Well-Known Member
https://www.deseretnews.com/article/700048253/Immigrant-list-creates-fear-State-had-same-data.html

Sweet.

Arizona's policemen will ask for papers. We make lists and threatening phone calls. Maybe Idaho can attack their churches and maybe we can send all the rest of them to camps in Texas. We could even include showers and furnaces at those camps, you know, for them to live "peacefully" away from us law-abiding citizens.

Of course, we all know that this is about upholding the Constitution and fighting illegal immigration and not just hating on a particular group or nationality....

SALT LAKE CITY — "We know you are illegal," the stranger on the phone said, "and will call immigration. We know where you live."

The call came Wednesday after parents at the home were included on a list of 1,300 Hispanics who are supposedly living in Utah illegally. The list was sent Monday to law enforcement and news media by an anonymous group aiming to have the people deported.

After the call came, children at the home were so upset they began crying, said Tony Yapias, director of Proyecto Latino and a former state director of Hispanic affairs. Their mom left work to go home and comfort them, Yapias said.

He said the threatening call is just the tip of the iceberg of problems the list has caused. He said people on it are talking of moving, are terrified of being deported and worry about being attacked. He says both legal and illegal immigrants around the state worry they are on it and may be targeted.

Meanwhile, the Utah Department of Workforce Services confirmed on Wednesday that its databases contain much of the same information that was on the list, but the department is still investigating whether it was the actual source of any or all of the list data.

"We're still looking. Some of those data are contained within our database. We're looking to see if it entirely came from our database or other sources," said department spokesman Dave Lewis.

He said his agency is trying to determine if it is a coincidence, or if it is so similar in detail and scope that a breach likely occurred.

Angie Welling, spokeswoman for Gov. Gary Herbert, said several state departments are conducting internal reviews about whether their databases had been used. "We have not given agencies a timeline for completion but know that they are actively working to determine if their division and/or staff was somehow involved," she said.

Paul Murphy, spokesman for Utah Attorney General Mark Shurtleff, said depending on what the agencies find, the attorney general's office may consider criminal charges if it finds a state employee improperly used confidential state databases.

The list that was released publicly includes birth dates, phone numbers and addresses for everyone on the list. For some of those people, it has Social Security numbers it says they are using. It includes the exact due dates for several pregnant women. The names of many children are included. Almost all names are Hispanic, ignoring other nationality groups that may include illegal immigrants.

Yapias was the one who initially called for the governor to investigate whether state databases were used, because he said he doubted such detailed information would be otherwise available.

A letter from the anonymous group that spread the list, however, said the information was compiled by people who watched Hispanics in their neighborhoods, stores, schools and churches and who gathered other data with the help of "Mexican nationals who infiltrate their social networks."

Yapias said he doubts that. He notes that the list includes names from Logan to St. George, and Moab to Wendover — not just one easy-to-watch neighborhood.

He said he has also found that almost everyone on the list has a close relative who is a U.S. citizen, such as U.S.-born children of illegal-immigrant parents.

He said if such a U.S. citizen applied for food stamp benefits, for example, the amount they would receive would depend on how many people lived in the household, including illegal immigrants. He suspects the list came from a state social service agency because it contains so many names of children.

Late Wednesday afternoon, Yapias said he had only slept an hour or two since the list was released, because his phone is constantly ringing from people who are scared, or who want to know if they are on the list.

"Of every 20 calls I get, only one has their name on the list," he said. "But everyone thinks they are on the list, so everyone is terrified." He said that extends even to U.S. citizens who have Hispanic names, who fear they are on it and may face problems.

Yapias said several say they are planning to move — including at least one who is looking at returning to Mexico.

"They're afraid," Yapias said. "The lady said she and her husband were talking and decided that with the economy, if things don't get better, they will just go back. Of course, that is exactly what groups behind this probably want."

Yapias said he has also been taking phones calls from national and international new media interested in the vigilante feel to the list and how it comes as Utah legislators are preparing to consider a law similar to one in Arizona that would require police to check the immigration status of people they stop if they have reason to believe they are here illegally.

Salt Lake City officials heard public testimony Tuesday from members of the Latino community who lauded the stance taken by Salt Lake Police Chief Chris Burbank in opposition to an Arizona-style revamp of Utah immigration law.

Among groups that praised Burbank and opposed the Arizona-style law were the Utah Republican Hispanic Assembly, Utah Coalition of La Raza and Centro Civico Mexicano.

Afterward, Mayor Ralph Becker's chief of staff, David Everitt reiterated the mayor's support of Burbank's stance that immigration enforcement duties should not be placed on the backs of local cops.

Councilman Carlton Christensen said Wednesday that Tuesday's discussion clearly expressed the council's support of Burbank, and he expressed hope that the complex issue will be addressed at the federal level.
 
If the list was obtained illegally, than those that obtained it need to be prosecuted to the full extent of the law.
 
maybe we can send all the rest of them to camps in Texas. We could even include showers and furnaces at those camps, you know, for them to live "peacefully" away from us law-abiding citizens.

I heard they have showers and furnaces in some places in Mexico. It might be simpler to just send them there.
 
i like this list! the us is the only place where people get rewarded for eentering a country illegally! i love the az law and i hope utah passes one too!
 
Occam's razor: if you're here illegally, and you're scared for your life/safety/being deported.... Get legallized. I honestly don't get it.
 
If the list was obtained illegally, than those that obtained it need to be prosecuted to the full extent of the law.

Completely agree. And given some of the information on the list it's apparent that it was obtained illegally. I mean, the due dates of pregnant women? That violates HIPPA at a minimum.
 
i like this list! the us is the only place where people get rewarded for eentering a country illegally! i love the az law and i hope utah passes one too!

This should end any discussion as to the question if I have an "alter ego". I will no longer even joke about it.
 
Almost all names are Hispanic, ignoring other nationality groups that may include illegal immigrants.

Maybe because most illegals are Hispanic? ****, it doesn't take a sirkicky to know that either.
 
To me, why even give out this list in the first place?

Why not create and distribute a list of companies that are hiring illegal immigrants? Why a list of men, pregnant women, and children? Instead of making threatening phone calls, how about we boycott those businesses, demand that laws be enforced, and basically force businesses to abide by the law?
If businesses cannot employ illegally, and illegals cannot find jobs here, then they'll stop coming and go back to their own countries.

Instead of asking those of darker skin pigmentation to show their papers, why not ask businesses to show that they are employing legally?

I think both this list and the AZ law misses the point completely. We don't need to attack races or individuals with this issue. Attack the reason why they're coming here. Attack businesses that are breaking the law. Is it because Republicans want to come across as "tough against illegals" while still allowing their buddies in the private sector go about as business as usual?

It all seems pretty hypocritical to me. IF the AZ governor really wanted to get tough on illegal immigration, she'd crack down on AZ's private sector which is creating such a demand for illegals. Think about all those golf courses, construction companies, hotels, and restaurants that are breaking the law. Of course, perhaps some of them contribute the most to her campaign. Hypocrisy anyone?

She'd also create stricter laws for substance abuse while increasing funding of education and prevention.

But that's just my way of seeing things. What do you guys think?
 
To me, why even give out this list in the first place?

Why not create and distribute a list of companies that are hiring illegal immigrants? Why a list of men, pregnant women, and children? Instead of making threatening phone calls, how about we boycott those businesses, demand that laws be enforced, and basically force businesses to abide by the law?
If businesses cannot employ illegally, and illegals cannot find jobs here, then they'll stop coming and go back to their own countries.

Instead of asking those of darker skin pigmentation to show their papers, why not ask businesses to show that they are employing legally?

I think both this list and the AZ law misses the point completely. We don't need to attack races or individuals with this issue. Attack the reason why they're coming here. Attack businesses that are breaking the law. Is it because Republicans want to come across as "tough against illegals" while still allowing their buddies in the private sector go about as business as usual?

Why not enforce the illegal immigration law first to those who are breaking it? If there were no illegals, no one could hire them. That's where I would start.
 
Maybe because most illegals are Hispanic? ****, it doesn't take a sirkicky to know that either.
Well technically. But it's deeper than that. It's more than controlling the supply and demand for workers sitting outside the Home Depot.

There was concern I believe in World warII (if I'm not completely offbase) that our enemies in Europe would use the weak/non-existent government and visa laws in Mexico to invade the US from the South. This is a concern for our weak borders, because our enemies now who cannot make it into the US through the US can go through Mexico.

That's the only valid non-racist opinion I think anyone can provide for strict borders. Doesn't really explain the mass deportation though.
 
Well technically. But it's deeper than that. It's more than controlling the supply and demand for workers sitting outside the Home Depot.

There was concern I believe in World warII (if I'm not completely offbase) that our enemies in Europe would use the weak/non-existent government and visa laws in Mexico to invade the US from the South. This is a concern for our weak borders, because our enemies now who cannot make it into the US through the US can go through Mexico.

That's the only valid non-racist opinion I think anyone can provide for strict borders. Doesn't really explain the mass deportation though.

I'm not sure if this was ever really a threat in WW II.

But it surely was in WW I. One of the main driving points for getting us into the war was when we were given a telegram a few months before we entered the war. Germany told Mexico that it would help recover all the lands it had lost against us if it joined the Axis cause and declared war on the US of A.

https://www.archives.gov/education/lessons/zimmermann/

In January of 1917, British cryptographers deciphered a telegram from German Foreign Minister Arthur Zimmermann to the German Minister to Mexico, von Eckhardt, offering United States territory to Mexico in return for joining the German cause. This message helped draw the United States into the war and thus changed the course of history. The telegram had such an impact on American opinion that, according to David Kahn, author of The Codebreakers, "No other single cryptanalysis has had such enormous consequences." It is his opinion that "never before or since has so much turned upon the solution of a secret message." In an effort to protect their intelligence from detection and to capitalize on growing anti-German sentiment in the United States, the British waited until February 24 to present the telegram to Woodrow Wilson. The American press published news of the telegram on March 1. On April 6, 1917, the United States Congress formally declared war on Germany and its allies.
 
This has nothing to do with illegal immigrants per se..just a way to reduce the number of annoying bandwagon Laker fans :p
 
It's simple,
1.) Strengthen the border, making it harder for people to make it here illegally.
2.) Make the legal immigration process a little easier, for those who obviously qualify.
3.) Attack the businesses (all of them) who hire Illegal immigrants, no jobs? no reason to be here. they'll make their way back eventually.

why make everything so hard? it's total bol ****

Why not enforce the illegal immigration law first to those who are breaking it? If there were no illegals, no one could hire them. That's where I would start.

If there was an effective way to do it, while not potentially infringing upon the rights of people who happen to be here legally, I think we should too. As of today, I haven't seen of or heard of such a plan.
 
Why not enforce the illegal immigration law first to those who are breaking it? If there were no illegals, no one could hire them. That's where I would start.

I don't think that's nearly as realistic or effective as attacking businesses. I mean, you may spend months tracking down an individual illegal immigrant. Why not spend that time to crack down on a business that is hiring many?

The last two years have seen the greatest drop in immigration to the US in decades. Why is that I wonder?

Whether it's religion, economics, or politics, PREVENTION is the best medicine. I don't understand why the same people that want us to drill here domestically in order to stop making arabs rich don't do the same thing in this situation. Their theory is that if we eliminate the demand for foreign oil (because our domestic oil drilling will provide for our needs) then we'll be less beholding to them. Yet, for some reason, the same people who preach energy independence tend to overlook or forget that if we lower or eliminate the demand for illegals, then immigration will fall.

Besides, it's simple conservative Adam Smith economics here, SUPPLY and DEMAND. Eliminate the demand for illegals and the supply will drop (as we've seen the past few years). Eliminating the supply isn't nearly as effective as limiting the demand (which is what enforcement has focused on for decades).

It is my opinion that Arizona lawmakers really don't want to crack down on illegal immigration. They don't want to see a fall in campaign contributions. Yes, they'll make a lot of smoke and wrap themselves up with the American flag with this law that they passed. They'll get the votes from the sheep.

But they are doing so knowing that the law won't make a significant dent in illegal immigration. They know that it won't even come close to solving the problem. They know that there are far better and effective solutions out there.

But those solutions include biting the hand that feeds them.

Great day for being a politician in AZ. You gain votes from people thinking that you are tough against illegal immigration. Yet you keep getting money from businesses that are breaking the law. Best of both worlds.
 
It has nothing to do with making the process "easier." The legal immigration cap is obviously too low.

Legal immigration Visas are completely allocated on the first day they become available. That's not an issue of making it easier to navigate the process. If it was about ease of access then some Visas would go unallocated.

Some of this is about priorities. There are special mechanisms that allow certain individuals to come to the U.S. easily. For instance, Yao Ming didn't have any immigration problems.

Some of it is about election politics. It's difficult to propose, especially as a Republican, an increase in the cap on legal Visas because you will be portrayed in your next primary as soft on immigration.
 
I don't think that's nearly as realistic of effective as attacking businesses. I mean, you may spend months tracking down an individual illegal immigrant. Why not spend that time to crack down on a business that is hiring many?

The last two years have seen the greatest drop in immigration to the US in decades. Why is that I wonder?

Whether it's religion, economics, or politics, PREVENTION is the best medicine.

Besides, it's simple conservative Adam Smith economics here, SUPPLY and DEMAND. Eliminate the demand for illegals and the supply will drop (as we've seen the past few years). Eliminating the supply isn't nearly as effective as limiting the demand (which is what enforcement has focused on for decades).

I too, think that would be a great plan to go after business and probably the most realistic and effective legal way. Here's an interesting thought, how many illegals could you find in one day if you tried? Honestly, I could find hundreds of them at their jobs, residences, and stores. Yeah, I might point out a few that are here legally, but in a simple world, that would be a pretty effective way to filter out the illegals, right? (Yes, I understand a method like that will never happen.)
 
Completely agree. And given some of the information on the list it's apparent that it was obtained illegally. I mean, the due dates of pregnant women? That violates HIPPA at a minimum.

Not to mention it probably violates the Health Information Portability and Acountability Act, or HIPAA.

Sorry, you are usually so up on these things, I couldn't resist.
 
Back
Top