chemdude1232
Active Member
Nope; I've written multiple times that if Fes had had enough sense to realize that all it takes to get PT from Sloan is to tow the party line. So no, the fault does not rest entirely on Sloan's shoulders, assuming that Fes was really jackpotting around in practice as has been so widely reported (I"m not questioning that, too, although I do wonder about the magnitude of his mischief in practice that has caused it to be such a big deal).
I place a large responsibility on Sloan also because it's the coach's job to get teams ready to play. In Fes's case, his jackpotting probably hurt his rate of progression, but the optimal strategy is not to DNP him for games on end. The optimal strategy is to tell him that he's getting 5 MPG or 10 MPG instead of 10 MPG or 15 MPG if he applied himself more. Sloan's spat with Kirilenko 5 or so years ago stemmed from Sloan not being clear with Kirilenko about his role. Just so the Sloan apologists to come slithering to his defense, Kirilenko bears some of the responsibility also. I guess that AK could've gone to Coach and said, "Coach, why have you reduced my minutes drastically for no reason, and why are people not passing the ball to me any more, and why have you not told me about it?", but that's tough for most 25-year-olds to bring themselves to do. A hall-of-fame coach should be an extremely effective communicator, and there is a pattern here that some JazzFanz deny. It's the same pattern of noncommunication when he lets Okur (and Boozer) stay in the game without any retribution for their matador defense. Okur wasn't usually scoring THAT much for it to be essential to be out there, and the theory behind benching Boozer for 5 minutes is that it'll be paid back in spades with better defense for the rest of the game. (And who knows; maybe his substitute will not display a dropoff from Booze anyway. In either case, a 5-minute benching anytime before the middle of Q4 isn't usually going to cost the Jazz the game.)
It's looking like our source of disagreement rests on perspective then. Coach vs. player, teacher vs. student, whatever you want to call it. I'll readily agree that, on the surface at least, Sloan's propensity to bench (i.e. DNP) Fes for games on end reeks of bitterness and the inability to "let go," as long as you'll agree (and it seems like you do agree) that a contributing factor is Fes' so-called jackpotting which, well-enough-known, is something that ticks off Sloan.
This raises a good question: why did none of the team mates act as intermediary with Sloan? Or at the very least, why did none of them help Fes figure out how to get on Sloan's good side? Doesn't this seem like there are some other things going on? Things that are known only to the team, and not outsiders?