What's new
By:

We must get Nash.

NAOS said:
Miller was just a salary match anyway. Sorry for not logging on to ESPN every 12 hours or less. I'll think about correcting this. Then, I won't.
Click to expand...

I haven't looked at ESPN in 2 years. I happen to just not be a moron.
 
Anyway, back on topic, what would you do? (try and use your head for something other than a hat-rack this time)
 
Nash is too old and its not worth it. If we were a team that was contending and close to a championship than I would do it. But we are not so we would be trading away our talent for 5 more wins in a season. Playoff time we would be out in the first or 2nd round. So its a worthless trade.

Keep Harris. Trade Millsap for a solid wing player and a future PG. That is all we can get out of Millsap. Not as valuable as everyone in this forum believes.
 
I'm not even going to bother reading this thread, but I feel how I should comment on how dumb it probably is.
 
Cyrone Torbin said:
I'm not even going to bother reading this thread, but I feel how I should comment on how dumb it probably is.
Click to expand...

do me a favor... give it a browse, then tell us if you think "moronic" is an appropriate description. I'll rep your honest appraisal.
 
Cyrone Torbin said:
I'm not even going to bother reading this thread, but I feel how I should comment on how dumb it probably is.
Click to expand...

I don't blame you. I don't even click on 99% of the trade threads. They're all crap.

NAOS said:
do me a favor... give it a browse, then tell us if you think "moronic" is an appropriate description. I'll rep your honest appraisal.
Click to expand...

If he agrees that it's "moronic", you can have +7 innerwebz. If he agrees that you're such a tool that Craftsman is actively seeking you as a spokesperson, then you must... um, I don't know, Submit To SLOANFELD.
 
Sorry Trout

As has been discussed on multiple post, we believe we are 2 to 3 years away from being solid contenders. Most posters agree anyone that will be on the down side of their career in 2 or 3 years just is not a good fit for our current team. Make the same proposal in 3 years with Nash being the same age as now and you might get stronger support for your trade proposal.
 
jazzrule said:
As has been discussed on multiple post, we believe we are 2 to 3 years away from being solid contenders. Most posters agree anyone that will be on the down side of their career in 2 or 3 years just is not a good fit for our current team. Make the same proposal in 3 years with Nash being the same age as now and you might get stronger support for your trade proposal.
Click to expand...

I can tell you are a very polite gentleman.
 
Dude, this trade blows. Josh Childress? Really? He is awful, 5 ppg and a .063(Not a typo) 3 point%. Add on to the fact he has a gross contract. Nash wouldn't stay most likely past this year.
 
Twin Towers said:
Nash is too old and its not worth it. If we were a team that was contending and close to a championship than I would do it. But we are not so we would be trading away our talent for 5 more wins in a season. Playoff time we would be out in the first or 2nd round. So its a worthless trade.

Keep Harris. Trade Millsap for a solid wing player and a future PG. That is all we can get out of Millsap. Not as valuable as everyone in this forum believes.
Click to expand...

We're gonna get a solid wing AND a future point guard out of trading Millsap?
 
Trout, sorry, I was sniffing glue yesterday and it must have contaminated my senses. This trade is God awful and reeks like your tighty-whities.
 
KrazeeEyezKilla said:
Trout, sorry, I was sniffing glue yesterday and it must have contaminated my senses. This trade is God awful and reeks like your tighty-whities.
Click to expand...

It's about time you came around.... You usually have sound arguments.... you had me scared for a second!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top