What's new

We Need to Talk About Kevin

Who were we going to pick at 14 that would make the playoffs not worth it? The Jazz set a goal, worked hard, and achieved it. So what if they got swept. Next year they'll set a higher goal.

And we gained a pick next year! The only thing we really lost was the difference in quality between this year's guy and next year's. It's crazy there are people out there who would trade a successful season for this hypothetical difference. You'd all be managing the Kings or the Warriors.

The Warriors have been so afraid of giving up a pick that they get worse and worse every year just to stay under the protections of the Marcus Williams trade. That's how to build a team! Stay just sucky enough to get in under your pick protections, and, then one year BAM, you're a top 5 team and who cares about the 26th pick anyways?
 
We all know GS put a tanking clinic on. In order to lose that game Utah would have had to do it on purpose. That's what tanking is. If Harp finds that fact offensive maybe he's the guy not willing to face reality.

Look, Brownie. I actually like you as a poster. I agree with a lot of your opinions, and I can appreciate anyone who comes in here after the Jazz lose a game, and defends the players and coach when everyone else is freaking out and calling for their heads. Having said that, I am completely baffled how anyone, after all the discussion we've had during the season, could STILL not understand that the difference between tanking and losing on purpose.

Losing on purpose just flat out DOES NOT HAPPEN in the NBA, nor would I ever want or suggest the Jazz should do so. GS absolutely did tank, but in no way were the players throwing games, or I can guarantee you that there would have been no chance of losing the pick on a coin toss. Tanking, on the other hand, is something that happens every single year, and to a degree, has been done by every single team in the NBA. It has nothing to do with players losing on purpose. It's simply about management making moves that are more about improving in the future than they are in the present, and it doesn't always mean that the team loses games, even if that's what management intended. Not every team has taken it to the level that GS did, but anyone who believes it doesn't happen routinely, IS naive to the way things work in the NBA. There are a lot of people who have an idealistic idea of how they think things should work in the NBA, but unfortunately, it just isn't reality, and quite honestly, I have no idea why anyone would want their team's GM to be playing checkers, when every other GM in the league is playing chess. Regardless, it doesn't matter. There is a reason why KOC and other GMs in the league aren't screaming bloody murder over GS tanking.

The fact is, if Utah had played the young guys more and still won the same amount of games Harp would still be mad. It is not about developing anything, it's just about assets. He further fails to recognize that all the young players improved, particularly Favors, despite the idea that Corbs kept the leash so tight.

There is absolutely no truth to any of this. I have defended the Jazz FO to a fault for years, and have been called a KOC apologist as recently as a week ago. I can honestly say that I've never once complained about a draft pick at the time it was made, because even though I had my doubts at times, I'm completely realistic about their available resources and effort put into making those decisions, compared to me just watching a few college games. I've defended pretty much every bad contract they've given out, including AK's( even though I was very much against it, even at the time), because I appreciate the fact that Utah doesn't have players knocking down the door to play here. When Utah first made the playoffs with Deron, we had basically the same kind of discussion in regards to pick vs. playoffs, and I was completely in the corner of playoffs, because at that time, it really WAS just about a single draft pick.

If you look back through this thread, you'll notice that I said KOC has been a good GM overall, and even though I think things should have been handled differently this year, I'm not even sure it wasn't more about ownership not wanting to risk a drop in ticket sales, so much as a bad move by KOC. Anyone who has been around here for any length of time, knows that if anything, I'm much more likely to take the side of management than I ever am to side with the complainers. I just happen to feel strongly about my opinion on this, and I get sick of the lame-*** arguments that always seem to use terms like "single draft pick", "too much youth", "loser mentality", and "losing on purpose", when those things have all been addressed a thousand times.


And just to be clear, I'm not even a true tanker. At the first of the season, I was all in favor of Utah waiting until the deadline to make a decision on trading Al or making a run at the playoffs. Needless to say, I don't care for the direction they took.
 
Last edited:
The quantifiable reason is getting maximum value for assets.

This season, dealing Sap, Al, or Devin at the deadline would not have gotten us a high pick. Alternatively, playing Burks/Hayward/Favors/Kanter mucho minutes might have gotten us a better pick, but at the cost of devaluing Al and Sap.

Al/Devin/Sap have more value to other teams as expirings (Sap might have had a little more at last year's deadline). And as expirings, we have more leverage in deals since letting them simply drop off the books is an attractive option.
.

Several things here. Even if you believe Al has more value now, which is iffy, you have to consider the potential value lost in missing out on the two picks. Overall, it's not likely they maximized the value of assets, even if they get a little more for Al.

Secondly, no way Sap has more value as an expiring.

Thirdly, if Utah doesn't trade these guys in the offseason, there's almost zero chance they get traded at the deadline, if Utah is in the playoff hunt again.



Forth, completely disagree with letting them expire as an attractive option. If Utah keeps the same roster and gives us a re-run of this year, it will be a major ****up.

So what I see is KOC playing his hand very well, and making or missing the playoffs was incidental. But he's at the critical moment when he has to play his winnings into a jackpot. No one remembers the guy who almost scaled Everest.

Yep, still a chance to come out smelling like a rose, but that would have to include player/s getting traded in the offseason.
 
Last edited:
Once again, agree with FreakinMatt. The idea that Al or Sap have ANY more value for having made the playoffs is laughable .. if anything, missing the playoffs by playing the young guys and 'mis-using' the vets may have more likely given a team more appetite for the abused ones.
 
Freak, check your inbox. I am drunk as hell so I hope it's still what I wanted it to be.

Edit: ninite everyone else, believe it or not I've earned a good night's sleep. Not everything BN does is being a dick around JazzFanz.
 
Freak, check your inbox. I am drunk as hell so I hope it's still what I wanted it to be.

Edit: ninite everyone else, believe it or not I've earned a good night's sleep. Not everything BN does is being a dick around JazzFanz.


Whoa!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Hang on a min. here. What exactly are you saying?

You're not the real KOC by any chance?!?!

Get Us LILLARD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Whatever IT TAKES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

EVEN BURKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
[h=3]The Genius Of Kevin O'Connor[/h]
By:Jonathan Tjarks
Apr 19, 2012 5:45 PM EDT
OConnor_Kevin_uta_080626.jpg
With a week left in the regular season, the final playoff spot in the Western Conference is down to three teams: the Phoenix Suns, Houston Rockets and Utah Jazz. But while both the Suns and Rockets are firmly stuck on the mediocrity treadmill,not bad enough to rebuild and not good enough to contend, the Jazz have pulled off the high-wire act of committing to a full rebuild without tanking.

Houston GM Daryl Morey has become a cult figure in the NBA blogosphere, but it’s Utah GM Kevin O’Connor who has been running rings around most of the league. He should be the NBA’s Executive of the Year, as the Jazz will be reaping the fruits of his decisions for years to come.

The only way for a small-market team to build a championship contenderis through the draft, which is why tanking has become increasingly popular. But because O’Connorsold high when he had an unhappy superstar, he was able to get two high lottery picks without needing to blow up the rest of the team.

The Jazz acquired two high-upside 6’10+ players (Enes Kanter and Derrick Favors) without the losing teams typically need to do so, which has given them the luxury of bringing both young big men along slowly. Utah has two parallel cores in place: a veteran group led by Al Jefferson, Paul Millsap and Devin Harris and a nucleus of four under-22 lottery picks.

Utah also has the rights to the Golden State Warriors 2012 first-round pick if it falls outside of the top 7; they could get a playoff berth and a lottery pick out of the 2011-12 season while the Warriors get neither.

However, having lottery picks is only half the battle. A GM still needs to be able to identify good young talent that“fits”well together over the long haul. O’Connor has been masterful, selecting players at premium positions whose skill sets don’t replicate each other.

When he was shopping Deron Williams, he ignored flashy perimeter talent and focused on finding an athletic young big man who can protect the rim. Favors has slipped under the radar in his first two seasons, but he’sa 6’10 245 athlete with a 7’4 wingspan and a 35’ max verticalcapable of anchoring a championship-caliber defense. Per-36 minutes, the 20-year-old is averaging 14.7 points, 11.1 rebounds and 1.6 blocks on 49% shooting.

In the 2011 Draft, rather than taking a point guard like Brandon Knight, he opted for Kanter, a 6’11, 260 big man with an excellent feel for scoring out of the low post as well as a developing mid-range jumper (he is shooting 65.6% from the free-throw line this season). Per-36 minutes, the 19-year-old is averaging 12.2 points and 11.6 rebounds on 49% shooting.

Whilethe rest of the NBA is getting smaller, Utah will have a 6’10+ athlete who can patrol the paint and a skilled 6’11+ player who can punish teams offensively.It’s the same basic formulathe Dallas Mavericks used to stun their more high-profile opponents in the 2011 playoffs.

Just as importantly, O’Connor’s selections give him a lot more flexibility going forward.There will always be good guards available, which is why Utah took a center, power forward and small forward first, as it’smuch harder to find even replacement-level players at those positions.

Hayward, their 6’8, 210 small forward, will never be a star, but he hasthe skill-set and athleticism to be a solid two-way starter. Per-36 minutes, the 22-year-old is averaging 14.1, 4.2 rebounds and 3.7 assists on 45% shooting.

Burks, their 6’6, 200 shooting guard, may not be a front-line starter, as he’s neither a great jump shooter (shooting 29% from three) nor playmaker (averaging 2.2 assists on 2.0 turnovers). However, he’s a good athlete who can get to the rim and create his own shot (averaging 16.0 points per 36 minutes while taking40%of his shots in the paint), and he could become a Sixth Man of the Year candidate as a bench scorer.

And with a frontcourt of the future already in place, O’Connor will have the luxury of picking through one of the deepest drafts in recent memory for perimeter help.

His first priority should be at point guard, as Favors and Kanter need someone who can run a team, find them on the break and get them shots in the half-court. Kendall Marshall (UNC) would make a lot of sense, as Utah could hide his defensive shortcomings while his jaw-dropping passing ability (9.8 assists on 2.8 turnovers this year) would be extremely valuable on a roster full of finishers.

Meanwhile, if Golden State’s rather embarrassing attempt to keep their pick comes up short, O’Connor will be able to round out his starting five with a future star at shooting guard. Bradley Beal (Florida) will probably be off the board, but Terrence Ross (Washington), Jeremy Lamb (UConn) and Dion Waiters (Syracuse) should still be available, and all three have All-Star caliber athleticism, shooting and shot-creating ability.

Two years ago, Utah was a capped-out veteran team with a frustrated star eyeing free agency. Now, thanks to O’Connor’s shrewd long-term planning, they have one of the NBA’s most promising young core all while staying in playoff contention. Even if the Jazz end up falling behind the Rockets or the Suns, they are in a far superior position going forward.





Read more:https://basketball.realgm.com/blog/220583/The_Genius_Of_Kevin_OConnor#ixzz1xRbdcXaW
 
Meanwhile, if Golden State’s rather embarrassing attempt to keep their pick comes up short, O’Connor will be able to round out his starting five with a future star at shooting guard. Bradley Beal (Florida) will probably be off the board, but Terrence Ross (Washington), Jeremy Lamb (UConn) and Dion Waiters (Syracuse) should still be available, and all three have All-Star caliber athleticism, shooting and shot-creating ability.

Two years ago, Utah was a capped-out veteran team with a frustrated star eyeing free agency. Now, thanks to O’Connor’s shrewd long-term planning, they have one of the NBA’s most promising young core all while staying in playoff contention. Even if the Jazz end up falling behind the Rockets or the Suns, they are in a far superior position going forward.

He made a mistake in not getting max. value out of Millsap & Jefferson at the trade dateline. Being left without a pick in this loaded draft is inexcusable IMO.
 
In KOC's 13 years, the Jazz have won five playoff series. Granted, his hands were tied for most of that time by Jerry and/or Larry. He gets a lot of praise for keeping the Jazz competitive, but there does need to be a hard look at what constitutes competitive for the team and winning five playoff series in 13 years doesn't fit the description for me.

Read this and craved some context. Here is some:

(playoff series wins from 2000-2012)

29 LA Lakers
22 San Antonio
16 Detroit
14 Miami
14 Boston
13 Dallas
9 New Jersey
8 Phoenix
8 Cleveland
7 Indiana
6 OKC/Seattle
6 Philadelphia
6 Orlando
5 Utah
5 Sacramento
3 Chicago
3 Atlanta
3 N.O./Char
2 LA Clippers
2 Denver
2 Minnesota
2 Milwaukee
2 Portland
2 New York
1 Memphis/Van
1 Houston
1 Golden State
1 Washington
1 Toronto
0 Charlotte

Decidedly middle-of-the-pack. Now I know.
 
Read this and craved some context. Here is some:

(playoff series wins from 2000-2012)

29LA Lakers
22San Antonio
16Detroit
14Miami
14Boston
13Dallas
9New Jersey
8Phoenix
8Cleveland
7Indiana
6OKC/Seattle
6Philadelphia
6Orlando
5Utah
5Sacramento
3Chicago
3Atlanta
3N.O./Char
2LA Clippers
2Denver
2Minnesota
2Milwaukee
2Portland
2New York
1Memphis/Van
1Houston
1Golden State
1Washington
1Toronto
0Charlotte

Decidedly middle-of-the-pack. Now I know.

How many times did the Jazz lose to the eventually NBA champs?
 
As I've said .. a deal was done with GSW and ..well it fell apart (details buried in the long thread). Now, there appears to be a real done .. we'll see.
 
I don't know any. I've tried.

Anything I would guess, would be just that, and suddenly turned into, "PKM said the details of the deal are ..." <---- Truth, lol.
 
I don't know any. I've tried.

Anything I would guess, would be just that, and suddenly turned into, "PKM said the details of the deal are ..." <---- Truth, lol.

You have brought it upon yourself. Your signature makes all if us believe you a little too much.
 
I don't know any. I've tried.

Even if you get details here, don't post them, or at least not too many. Knowing the details of a deal two days in advance of it's annoucn=ement doesn't really change the quality of my life, and can only get you in trouble.
 
Even if you get details here, don't post them, or at least not too many. Knowing the details of a deal two days in advance of it's annoucn=ement doesn't really change the quality of my life, and can only get you in trouble.

Good advice. I actually got better info in the past, but I have been asking whether I can share the info (as a matter of full disclosure). I've noticed a definite lockdown from some that just won't take the risk .. that used to be more loose-lipped. I've been careful to not betray any confidences along the way. That would certainly not be worth it.
 
Back
Top