What I take away from this season is that we actually have a long, LONG way to go. We basically have 0 good, well-rounded players. Everyone is basically only effective on one side of the floor if effective at all, most of those players are neutral defenders at best, and we are missing any mentionable connective tissue. We don’t even know if we have any 3&D guys or glue guys. Our only good ballhandler/playmaker can’t shoot, our second-best passer is probably a rookie big who can’t currently defend.
That the Jazz actually suck should come as no surprise when you look at the record, but I think a lot of us have been laboring under a delusion if we think we’re going to make any real noise within the next five years unless we get insanely lucky.
I had some thoughts on this post, but hadn't had time until now to really respond.
First of all, I think it's pretty clear that we are not as bad as our record. About a month ago there was a graphic posted on Jazzfanz with number of games lost due to injury and the Jazz were 2nd or 3rd, with about 9 games lost at that time. I'm guessing by the end of the year we will have about 12 games lost due to "injury" (aka sitting our good players). That would put us at about the 8th worst team in the league which feels about right. This doesn't take away from your larger point, but I do think there is a significant difference between where we are in the standings and how good this team is as currently constructed.
Secondly, I don't think we always take in to consideration how beneficial it is for players to play with good players and how detrimental it is to play with bad players. Rookies and sophomores are expected to be bad/detrimental players and so as we have been prioritizing development/optimizing our draft pick it makes sense to play our rookies and sophomores as much as possible. However, because of this it is difficult to say how good/bad our players/team is because they have had to share the court with bad players so frequently. Also, because of this it can be easier than expected to be, "competitive" by just deprioritizing development and surround the team with actual NBA players. Detroit this year, and Houston last year are good examples of a team going from bottom of the league to a playoff team by just adding a few players and limiting, "development" time. If the goal is just to get to the playoffs, I think that could happen within two years.
Thirdly, and probably most importantly I completely agree with what I think your main point is. True contending teams are built around elite offenses and elite defenses, and we are extremely far away from that. In my opinion a great team has at most one weak link on offense or defense at a time (preferably 0) and our team as currently constructed has a long way to go. If you look at who I think are the two best teams in the league, Boston and OKC, then you can see the type of team we would need to become to get to contending status. Even if we get Flagg, we are so many players away from being at that point.
I just don't think the front office is committed to building a team like that. They keep drafting and putting significantly development time in to players who are very unlikely to be positives on both sides of the ball. I guess I've resigned myself to the fact that the Jazz are not building the type of team that I think has a real chance to contend AND I've grown sick of tanking, which has led me to be ok with them just trying to build a good team that can make the playoffs with hopefully guys that I like to cheer for. With that lower standard I'm ok with a lot of the guys on the team and to some extent, just want to see us start playing competitive basketball again.
Apologies for the long post.