Is he passing through the hoop? This is stupid, assists come from passing. They come from having good court vision, being unselfish, decisive, and building trust/learning the tendencies of one's team--as well as the opposing defenses.
And yes, I understand you are talking about the 3 creating floor space for him to observe and run the offense, but I disagree that should be his path. Plenty of PG's rack up assists, but can't shoot for **** beyond the arc: Rondo, Rubio, MCW, Vasquez, etc.
Burke shot 38& from 3 last yea and 34% the year before. While those percentages aren't horrible, they are not elite, especially for college range . He's not even best on the team. Hayward, Rush, Clark, and Richard Jefferson (in years prior to last year where he gave up and played 10 mpg) all shoot better 3% than that at the NBA level. Scott Machado shot 40% from downtown as a college senior. John Lucas shot 37% from deep last year. Burks shot 36%. Burke isn't, and likely won't be a sniper from 3 in the NBA. Yeah, he made a couple long-ranged, big time shots at Michigan, but that's not his calling anymore. He needs to run the ****ing offense and be a point guard.
This, a hundred times.
I mean, don't get me wrong. A good PG needs to shoot better than Tinsely, and Watson, but we don't need Burke pretending he's AI out there.
There are a lot of good scoring PG's, but how many are truly great at running their teams? I would much rather see Burke striving for 12 assists a night instead of 20 pts. (don't worry, those aren't statistical expectations, just a hope for his mindset).