Thee Idiotic Minivan K
Well-Known Member
Probably should’ve just drafted Whitmore.
Or not made a stupid trade for CollinsProbably should’ve just drafted Whitmore.
The Jazz (supposedly)had him ranked 18th. If he can get over the knee issues that could make him highly favored. I'm guessing part of the reason he was so bad on D was due to playing on a knee that needed surgery.Sure… that and defense… size… athleticism.
I don't really like Hendricks at 5. Hendricks would be an ideal 4. I think he can get to 230 pretty easily. At 230 he would weigh more than John Collins.He's a 3/4, though. IMO. Too light in the shorts to play 5 right now.
We will not have to search hard for Tay Hennys #1 hater.The Jazz (supposedly)had him ranked 18th. If he can get over the knee issues that could make him highly favored. I'm guessing part of the reason he was so bad on D was due to playing on a knee that needed surgery.
Being 6'6 with ball skills makes Sensabaugh highly playable early, moreso than Hendricks.
This. Hendricks is a diamond in the rough. Very very rough. He is going to be lost this year. Needs to move up a long learning curve. That should be our expectation. When he is sucking this year (all rookies suck), y’all going to be going crazy shouting “bust”. All I care about is improvement.The Jazz (supposedly)had him ranked 18th. If he can get over the knee issues that could make him highly favored. I'm guessing part of the reason he was so bad on D was due to playing on a knee that needed surgery.
Being 6'6 with ball skills makes Sensabaugh highly playable early, moreso than Hendricks.
There is nothing rough about Hendricks game. He has some skills like shooting, finishing at the rim and defense that are going to translate immediately.This. Hendricks is a diamond in the rough. Very very rough. He is going to be lost this year. Needs to move up a long learning curve. That should be our expectation. When he is sucking this year (all rookies suck), y’all going to be going crazy shouting “bust”. All I care about is improvement.
I was thinking the same thing. Hardy doesnt want to guarantee minutes to rookies and makes them earn them.. but if Hendricks calling card is his defense and he plays off ball on offense, then I dont think G League is the place for him. He needs to have a chance to adapt to NBA pace, strategies and opponent skills and athleticism to develop those further.I'm not sure Henricks has a game that would really benefit from playing big minutes in the G-League, similar to Ochai last year. He might be better off playing a few rotation minutes right away.
I'm not arguing that Hendricks should go to the G-League, but I do believe the G-League eventually helped Ochai. @homeytennis might be able to confirm, because my memory might not be accurate, but it felt like Agbaji finally started to string together some good games in the G-League before he went on his run of good games for the Jazz.I'm not sure Henricks has a game that would really benefit from playing big minutes in the G-League, similar to Ochai last year. He might be better off playing a few rotation minutes right away.
So I get what you're saying, and playing is better than not playing, but Hendricks is really intriguing as a 3-5 but his intrigue falls off a cliff for me if he's basically playing guard. Just makes him a tall, worse-shooting Ochai. Would be an interesting approach developmentally but we would need to prepare ourselves that he is basically invisible or just flat out bad in that context (which can hamper his development).
Why should Hendricks be pencilled in for minutes over Sensabaugh?
Overall there is a chance Sensabaugh is better but his specific talents aren’t really a huge need and are something that isn’t handed over to rookies and his huge glaring weakness is a thing that gets you planted on the bench. If both guys are healthy I am extremely confident that Taylor gets more minutes. Brice’s college defensive tapes reminded me of Grayson Allen as a rookie… and that was against college players. We will see if that was just a focus or commitment thing but he was atrocious.I feel like people are clowning on this take, but the Jazz and Hardy have made it clear that they aren’t going to give Hendricks minutes just to give him minutes. He will have to earn them, and if Brice is a better player than him it would align that Brice plays instead.
If you’re pencilling in Hendricks > Brice it’s either.
1) Saying that Hendricks is definitively a better player day 1.
2) The Jazz will give Hendricks the minutes without them being earned.
I’m not sure I’d be so confident about #1 and whether they’re lying or not they’ve been pretty adamant about #2.
Overall there is a chance Sensabaugh is better but his specific talents aren’t really a huge need and are something that isn’t handed over to rookies and his huge glaring weakness is a thing that gets you planted on the bench. If both guys are healthy I am extremely confident that Taylor gets more minutes. Brice’s college defensive tapes reminded me of Grayson Allen as a rookie… and that was against college players. We will see if that was just a focus or commitment thing but he was atrocious.
Somewhat of a tangent, but one of the most amazing things about Kessler is that had very few bad games. I remember his very first preseason game as being pretty rough on the defensive end, but besides that I think he only had a few bad games all year. He also seemed to have that amazing quality of picking things up and learning super quickly. Whenever he would struggle he seemed to learn from it and become even better.Hardy want to improve defense and Hendricks is the best 3D prospect in the draft. He’s gonna get his minutes and just like Kessler he’s gonna struggle in his first few games then figure things out eventually. If not he’ll play with Johnny j in g-league.
He's a Freshman though, hopefully his game has more growth potential than Ochai and doing that in yh GLeague might be beneficialI'm not sure Henricks has a game that would really benefit from playing big minutes in the G-League, similar to Ochai last year. He might be better off playing a few rotation minutes right away.
We're talking about a 6-12 minute role at most (there's a chance there is no role to begin with) and who knows what exactly those lineups are going to be needing. If you're running a unit with Kessler and Dunn with no Clarkson/Sexton, for example, you might need more scoring punch. Brice was miles ahead of Hendricks offensively. I get that coaches want to be hard asses and stress defense, but reality is they should play the player who helps the team most regardless of whether that value comes from offense or defense. There's a reason why Hardy plays Clarkson. Bad defensive players get played all the time, young and old.
I think Hendricks ultimately gets more minutes, but I would say it's more on the basis of him being the #9 pick and not necessarily that he will be the better player day 1. I really don't think it's set in stone that Hendricks can help this team win more basketball games than Brice early on. Like I said, I just don't think people should scoff at the idea of Brice doing more early on if Hardy is actually true to his word about making guys earn it. This is true for Keyonte as well. Brice was arguably the best player out of the 3 last season so I wouldn't rule him out of being the most productive right away. Hendricks and Keyonte seemingly have been drafted for what they can be 5 years down the road whereas Brice fell because of where his knees might be 5 years down the road and not because of how productive he can be right away.