I hear the whole movie is just a bunch of cheesy one liners.
I'm sure even if it was, you wouldn't notice without a laughtrack.
I hear the whole movie is just a bunch of cheesy one liners.
A movie review should determine what a movie hoped to achieve, and whether it succeeded. The ambition of "Drive Angry 3D" is to make a grind house B movie so jaw-droppingly excessive that even Quentin Tarantino might send flowers. It succeeds. I can't say I enjoyed it. But I can appreciate it. It offends every standard of taste except bad. But it is well made.
![]()
It's a bad movie that's in on the joke. Highly recommend for viewing over seven jack and cokes and with some likewise-minded friends.
As always Ebert nails its sensibility and accurately describes its appeal:
Honestly, it took him the first 30 minutes to achieve what it took Kubrick <10 in 2001: A Space Odyssey. Just ****ing brutal.
I haven't seen Tree of Life but I'm shocked at this description of 2001 as being somehow briskly paced.
![]()
It's a bad movie that's in on the joke. Highly recommend for viewing over seven jack and cokes and with some likewise-minded friends.
As always Ebert nails its sensibility and accurately describes its appeal:
Has anyone seen Cars 2 yet? It doesn't look as good as the first and can't decide whether or not to waste money
Has anyone seen Cars 2 yet? It doesn't look as good as the first and can't decide whether or not to waste money
Just saw Transformers 3. Hated the second one, but this one was pretty bad ***. That supermodel chick can run in heels.
Supermodel chick running and you are checking out her footwear?