I am quite glad that I made a note of this movie when you posted this.
I saw Enemy about a month ago.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FJuaAWrgoUY
I have a friend at work who is quite the film intellect. He's also much more well read than I am, so his insight is always appreciated. But he does have a rather discerning taste and he is NOT a fan of Mr. Gyllenhaal.
Enemy is an absolutely fantastic film and when I saw it over a weekend, it kept me thinking about it. It's kind of a jarring film in the idea that you are trying to make sense of it all once you finish it. I wanted to get back to work to tell my buddy that he NEEDED to watch this movie. He did and he was affected as much as I was. We talked about it for hours one night. He also watched the DVD extras, which I didn't, and that gave a more complete picture of the story.
To say that Gyllenhaal was great in it is a ****ing understatement. His acting chops were as sharp as I had ever seen them and this is coming from someone who was rather indifferent to Jake.
RT @ 74% underrates this movie completely.
I enjoyed Enemy when I watched it a few months ago and agree that the 74% rating doesn't do it justice.
I think the fact that it is so abstract and so cryptic might have something to do with the low ratings... I am one of those people who think the movie should be able to stand on its own. There should be enough clues there on screen for viewers to be able to decipher what's going on and what some of the hidden messages are. (even if it requires multiple viewings)
The fact that we have to go away and watch the Extras and listen to Director's interviews or find possible plot "theories" online I think ultimately is a failing on the part of the Director.... I do think some of the clues could have been a bit more obvious. We want to peel the orange, but we need to know where to start.
It's the same issue I have with Mulholland Drive. I don't think I will ever understand 100% of what that movie was about and that's a real shame because it is such a great movie..