What's new
By:

Who are the Dems going to run in 2020?

R

r_u_s_t_b_u_c_k_e_t

Well-Known Member
Contributor
It's not too early! Sanders and Biden will be too old. Warren too (she's a very young-looking 67). I was going to make a poll, but I honestly can't think of anyone. Enlighten me with your wisdom, JF.
 
Kim Kardasian

first female President

Or maybe Snookie, goin' Toes with the Donald.
 
Gameface said:
Kim Kardasian

first female President

Or maybe Snookie, goin' Toes with the Donald.
Click to expand...

Celebrity, yes. Woman, no. Women don't vote for women candidates (Clinton '16, Palin, Clinton '08, Ferraro... all crushing defeats).

Maybe someone like Gordon Ramsey. Is he an American? I'm not kidding.
 
The only candidates this century we knew were going to be the nominee four years prior were McCain in '08 and Clinton in '16. Both lost. Maybe Kerry in '04, and he lost.

If democrats were smart, they'd nominate a candidate who caters to their actual base, young progressives and minorities, than their preferred establishment candidate. Worked with the last two.
 
r_u_s_t_b_u_c_k_e_t said:
Celebrity, yes. Woman, no. Women don't vote for women candidates (Clinton '16, Palin, Clinton '08, Ferraro... all crushing defeats).

Maybe someone like Gordon Ramsey. Is he an American? I'm not kidding.
Click to expand...

Yeah, I hear women have annoying voices and that's a pretty legit reason not to vote for them.
 
r_u_s_t_b_u_c_k_e_t said:
Celebrity, yes. Woman, no. Women don't vote for women candidates (Clinton '16, Palin, Clinton '08, Ferraro... all crushing defeats).

Maybe someone like Gordon Ramsey. Is he an American? I'm not kidding.
Click to expand...

I genuinely believe their candidacy did not fail because of their gender. Hillary being the nearest exception, but I think most agree she was a flawed candidate otherwise.
 
Darkwing Duck said:
The only candidates this century we knew were going to be the nominee four years prior were McCain in '08 and Clinton in '16. Both lost. Maybe Kerry in '04, and he lost.

If democrats were smart, they'd nominate a candidate who caters to their actual base, young progressives and minorities, than their preferred establishment candidate. Worked with the last two.
Click to expand...

This. This. This.
 
Booker's take on education sort of blows IMO so for me that stinks but I for the most part like him otherwise, he has a decent resume, and would probably be a great candidate for the Dems to put out there.
 
Darkwing Duck said:
The only candidates this century we knew were going to be the nominee four years prior were McCain in '08 and Clinton in '16. Both lost. Maybe Kerry in '04, and he lost.

If democrats were smart, they'd nominate a candidate who caters to their actual base, young progressives and minorities, than their preferred establishment candidate. Worked with the last two.
Click to expand...

#Kanye2020
 
r_u_s_t_b_u_c_k_e_t said:
no-talent celebrity. check. pretends to be rich under a mountain of debt. check. wife is a joke. check. "businessman". check. i think you're on to something here.
Click to expand...

Dont forget, no experience holding a public office and unqualified and kind of an *******/douche. He is perfect.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top