What's new
By:

Who should be our starting SF?

Beantown said:
Anyone have the stats on when Millsap played the 3 last season?
Click to expand...

i dont know about the stats but im sure, he shouldnt play 3 unless first 2 or even 3 candidates for that position are injured. He is born to be a PF, when he plays 3 he just cant use some of his abilities which make him a very good player. Even if he is raining 3s next year, he wouldnt play that position.
 
LogGrad98 said:
Prince_with-purple-guitar.jpg


I thought he was kind of short.
Click to expand...

Charlie Murphy has endorsed Prince's skills...
 
Ugh endless trade ideas....so I wonder how are even close to what the Jazz would do? I mean how many people predicted the D-will trade?
 
Harris
Burks
Hayward
Favors
Kanter

This is our line up for the future.. Let them start playing together now. I can see favors and burks as all stars but we don't have a super star so therefore we need to play as a team. That takes years. We need to be like how the pistonsplayed, they didn't have super stars but they knew how to play with each other
 
Skierfreak_3 said:
Harris
Burks
Hayward
Favors
Kanter

This is our line up for the future.. Let them start playing together now. I can see favors and burks as all stars but we don't have a super star so therefore we need to play as a team. That takes years. We need to be like how the pistonsplayed, they didn't have super stars but they knew how to play with each other
Click to expand...

Don't think Hayward can play the 3, just not big and strong enough. Carmelo, Durant, Lebron, etc would chew him up and spit him out on a nightly basis. We'll have to find this player in next years draft or possibly though a trade. Ultimately that means either Hayward or Burks will have to be relegated to a 6th man role, still getting about 30 minutes a game though.
 
Just as many tough assignments for Hayward at the 2 as the 3. And he's far more likely to get stronger rather than quicker. Hayward's 'position' as far as who he guards has yet to be sorted out.
 
billyshelby said:
Just as many tough assignments for Hayward at the 2 as the 3. And he's far more likely to get stronger rather than quicker. Hayward's 'position' as far as who he guards has yet to be sorted out.
Click to expand...

It's blowing my mind how some people on this board don't understand this... despite repeated re-hashings of this very point.
 
Trade millsap, miles and a future 1st for granger and they would do it. I would rather send out bell but I don't think they would do that.

Harris, Watson (resigned)
Hayward, burks
Granger, Evans (or some cheap free agent)
Favors, kanter
Jefferson, okur (i guess bring over

That is a play off team say good bye to utahs pick next year cause minny will take it and we will be picking 9-12 range with the gs pick take a point guard (want Austin rivers if he can play point or Marshall)

That is a ver very good team with a little seasoning
 
Xthren said:
Trade millsap, miles and a future 1st for granger and they would do it. I would rather send out bell but I don't think they would do that.

Harris, Watson (resigned)
Hayward, burks
Granger, Evans (or some cheap free agent)
Favors, kanter
Jefferson, okur (i guess bring over

That is a play off team say good bye to utahs pick next year cause minny will take it and we will be picking 9-12 range with the gs pick take a point guard (want Austin rivers if he can play point or Marshall)

That is a ver very good team with a little seasoning
Click to expand...

Millsap for Granger straight up would be fair value. But I still wouldn't do that because Granger is 28, by the time our core hits their prime Granger will be semi useless.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top