Doublea
Well-Known Member
A. Gordon at 5 seriously?
I know right, I've always said it feels like a reach for Gordon at 5, but I wouldn't be mad if that was the choice.
A. Gordon at 5 seriously?
Julius Randle at 5 and Kyle Anderson at 23
[size/HUGE] fixed [/size];848636 said:Hey Nickkk... you gottta stickkk to Randleee thruuu the enddd here. Don't be a bitttch.
I say Aaron Gordon at 5 and KJ McDaniels at 23. You've got the 3 sewn up for the immediate future and you're set if you can't / don't want to re-sign Hayward. If you do re-sign Hayward, you've got a deep 1-2-3 with Burks and Burke. AG can also play the 4. Either way, lots of flexibility.
Oh, and Spencer Dinwiddie at 35.
Julius Randle at 5 and Kyle Anderson at 23
LOL.. it takes one to know one.
what do you think?[size/HUGE] fixed [/size];849264 said:^this is a real response?
but if you can switch he wont really have to 'move'[size/HUGE] fixed [/size];849267 said:Kyle Anderson will not be able to guard starting SFs. Not even close.
A. Gordon at 5 seriously?
Yes, Aaron Gordon>Julius Randle ALL DAY! If Wiggins, Embiid, and Parker are not obtainable for the right price you sit tight and draft Aaron Gordon and not second guess yourself for a second.
C'mon now. No way the jazz would go for Gordon at 5. Unless they trade down to the 8-10 range. If we fail to trade up, I'm all in for trading down and getting Gordon at 8 or something.
but if you can switch he wont really have to 'move'
This message was brought to you via a mobile device
kkKKKkkkKKKKkkKKKKKkKKKkkkkkKKkkkkkkkkKKKkkkkkk
but if you can switch he wont really have to 'move'
This message was brought to you via a mobile device
kkKKKkkkKKKKkkKKKKKkKKKkkkkkKKkkkkkkkkKKKkkkkkk