What's new
By:

Why are gun owners afraid to admit they own guns?

One Brow said:
If someone in the house is alcoholic or depressed, it's much more dangerous when there is a gun present.

Is there any reason the doctor shouldn't know?
Click to expand...

It’s simply not their business. Frame it however you want. I’m not mad about it. Just think it’s irrelevant with some possible extreme situations.

I’ve never been asked. But if I was I’d probably tell them it’s not their business.
 
Stoked said:
It’s simply not their business. Frame it however you want. I’m not mad about it. Just think it’s irrelevant with some possible extreme situations.

I’ve never been asked. But if I was I’d probably tell them it’s not their business.
Click to expand...

If someone has a medical condition that's more dangerous when guns are around, it's not the business of the doctors to know about the guns?

Why is that more off-limits than, as an example, asking if you live near a large, stagnant pond?
 
One Brow said:
Can we agree there are different degrees of danger? I have never heard of a small child accidentally killing a family member with a hammer. I'm not aware of any study that indicates having a hammer in a household makes it more likely a resident will die. Both of these are true of guns.

I don't have a solid-enough take to know the best ways to keep gun ownership safe, but I certainly know a deceptive, facile, and weak analogy.
Click to expand...

fishonjazz said:
There are degrees of danger. A gun is way more dangerous than a hammer for instance.
Click to expand...

There certainly are degrees of danger. But it's people that's dangerous; an unanimated thing is not by itself.
There's always a chance that badass/stupid behaviors cause a deadly incident/accident, but there are other things statistically more deadly from a household point of view (i.e. car/motorcycle).
That said, I'll say I've got no problem is someone ask me if I've got a gun, and I'll take the highway here. Guns are a complex/sensitive theme, english is not native for me, no need to be misundertood or to misunderstand some other fellow poster.
 
Because guns represent masculinity. A masculinity that is threatened by economic and social gains by women and minorities and losses by globalization and automation. Research shows that white males are turning to guns and opioids to cope with these economic, social, and political changes. The NRA, GOP, Big Pharm, and gun manufacturers all benefit from this.

Newly unsealed documents in a landmark lawsuit Tuesday in Cleveland show the pressure within drug companies to sell opioids in the face of numerous red flags during the height of the epidemic.

The release of the exhibits — sworn depositions of executives, internal corporate emails and experts’ reports — also reveals the ignored concerns of some employees about the huge volume of pain pills streaming across the nation.

In one exhibit, emails show that a Purdue Pharma executive received an order from a distributor for 115,200 oxycodone pills, which was nearly twice as large as that distributor’s average order over the previous three months. The order came in at 4:15 p.m., according to the emails sent in October 2009.

It was approved one minute later.
Click to expand...

https://www.washingtonpost.com/inve...f3bf64-abe5-11e9-8e77-03b30bc29f64_story.html

Amazon product ASIN 1541644980
 
Thriller has answered the question for us on another topic post. "Personally, I can’t wait to see your faces when President Harris/Warren stuffs gun control, green tech, and universal health care down your throats via executive order." All very good reasons not to vote Democrat...thanks Thriller.
 
The Thriller said:
Because guns represent masculinity. A masculinity that is threatened by economic and social gains by women and minorities and losses by globalization and automation. Research shows that white males are turning to guns and opioids to cope with these economic, social, and political changes. The NRA, GOP, Big Pharm, and gun manufacturers all benefit from this.



https://www.washingtonpost.com/inve...f3bf64-abe5-11e9-8e77-03b30bc29f64_story.html

Amazon product ASIN 1541644980
Click to expand...

Hence, WV.
 
Stoked said:
This would be pretty much impossible to determine.
Click to expand...

We know the stats for one side. The other side would be an estimate, but there are some numbers to help estimate. But it's pretty safe bet to say more lives are lost than saved.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MVP
Ron Mexico said:
We know the stats for one side. The other side would be an estimate, but there are some numbers to help estimate. But it's pretty safe bet to say more lives are lost than saved.
Click to expand...

We have sod all gun crime here, deaths from home invasions are still lower than gun murders. I'd guess the most common cause of unnatural death is domestic violence.
 
Last edited:
Rubashov said:
We have sod all gun crime here, deaths from home invasions are still lower than gun murders. I'd guess the most common cause of unnatural death is domestic violence.
Click to expand...
Can you say that again in American?

Your gun crime is low, deaths from home invasion is even lower than gun deaths, the most common cause of murder is domestic violence?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top