What's new

Why no thread on the democratic debates?

Bump

Anyone able to answer these questions?

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app

Executive orders are made to handle specific things that fall under just the execute branch’s jurisdiction. There some action they can take on their own.

For example. There was an executive order back in 1948 banning segregation in the armed forces. As commander in chief that falls solely under the presidents power. But waging war, a declaration of war, needs congressional approval.
 
First off dumbass, I never voted for Trump...So you calling me his supporter just goes to show how bat **** crazy you loony cucks are. Did I like Trump over Mrs Arkancide, hell yes. I actually voted for Johnson though. Second, you have no damn clue what my "race" is. I could be Polynesian, African American, Asian....maybe I should buy you a belt with your name on it, so when you pull your head out of your ***, you can remember who you are.

You considered Mrs Arkancide a viable candidate, which means your opinion is worth jack squat. I'd love to meet you face to face and have you tell me to shut the hell up internet tough guy, i'd push your **** in.

Would love to see you try to push his Mandingo in. He ain’t Asian. Bruh.
 
Executive orders are made to handle specific things that fall under just the execute branch’s jurisdiction. There some action they can take on their own.

For example. There was an executive order back in 1948 banning segregation in the armed forces. As commander in chief that falls solely under the presidents power. But waging war, a declaration of war, needs congressional approval.

This. War represents a huge economic and human sacrifice and shouldn’t be handled lightly. At least seek the support of the representatives that the people voted for.
 
Executive orders are made to handle specific things that fall under just the execute branch’s jurisdiction. There some action they can take on their own.

For example. There was an executive order back in 1948 banning segregation in the armed forces. As commander in chief that falls solely under the presidents power. But waging war, a declaration of war, needs congressional approval.
Does executive branch = president and president alone?

Thanks for the response btw

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
 
What is conversation therapy?

In Ron Mexico's original post he wrote "conversation therapy" but he clearly meant "conversion" therapy. Just for the record, I did not undergo conversion therapy. I was making a joke about the fact that he clearly mis-wrote "conversion" with "conversation". I'm now wondering if I was the only one who noticed it in Ron Mexico's post.
 
In Ron Mexico's original post he wrote "conversation therapy" but he clearly meant "conversion" therapy. Just for the record, I did not undergo conversion therapy. I was making a joke about the fact that he clearly mis-wrote "conversion" with "conversation". I'm now wondering if I was the only one who noticed it in Ron Mexico's post.

I'm 150% straight. This was established about 10 years ago on this site. Troutbum may remember.
 
Does executive branch = president and president alone?

Thanks for the response btw

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app

He’s the head of the executive branch. But the VP, Cabinet and commissioners of regulatory agencies are all executive branch. Among others. President is the only one that can issue an executive order though (I think, not 100% sure in this point).
 
Last edited:
Ugh @Safetydan are you serious? I had no idea you were gay. Not that we broadcast that stuff on here but seriously, I’m very sorry you had to experience that. I can’t imagine. Not sure if you’re aware but there’s a movie that came out a year ago with the kid from Manchester by the Sea, Nicole Kidman, Russell Crowe and Joel Edgerton about the topic.

Appreciate the concern, friend.
 
In Ron Mexico's original post he wrote "conversation therapy" but he clearly meant "conversion" therapy. Just for the record, I did not undergo conversion therapy. I was making a joke about the fact that he clearly mis-wrote "conversion" with "conversation". I'm now wondering if I was the only one who noticed it in Ron Mexico's post.

I noticed and thought about making a joke about how I hated talking to my parents about some stuff as a teen.
 
First off dumbass, I never voted for Trump...So you calling me his supporter just goes to show how bat **** crazy you loony cucks are. Did I like Trump over Mrs Arkancide, hell yes. I actually voted for Johnson though. Second, you have no damn clue what my "race" is. I could be Polynesian, African American, Asian....maybe I should buy you a belt with your name on it, so when you pull your head out of your ***, you can remember who you are.

You considered Mrs Arkancide a viable candidate, which means your opinion is worth jack squat. I'd love to meet you face to face and have you tell me to shut the hell up internet tough guy, i'd push your **** in.

What are you going to push his **** in with? Your fist or with your ****? Weird threat bro.
 
First off dumbass, I never voted for Trump...So you calling me his supporter just goes to show how bat **** crazy you loony cucks are. Did I like Trump over Mrs Arkancide, hell yes. I actually voted for Johnson though. Second, you have no damn clue what my "race" is. I could be Polynesian, African American, Asian....maybe I should buy you a belt with your name on it, so when you pull your head out of your ***, you can remember who you are.

You considered Mrs Arkancide a viable candidate, which means your opinion is worth jack squat. I'd love to meet you face to face and have you tell me to shut the hell up internet tough guy, i'd push your **** in.

Let me repeat...

No one needs you telling us who can beat Trump. If you think Trump is a viable candidate against the current field of democrats, you have no idea who this nation is going to vote for.

Hillary is not a candidate, so shove that **** right back up you blown out *** hole.
 
I don't know if you've read Ta-Nehisi Coates argument for reparations but it's pretty convincing, and it's conclusion might surprise you a little.

https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/06/the-case-for-reparations/361631/

It's a really long read, but there's an audio version as well.

Here's his opening statement he gave to congress in support of HR 40, a bill which would study a commission to study reparations.

Yesterday, when asked about reparations, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell offered a familiar reply: America should not be held liable for something that happened 150 years ago, since none of us currently alive are responsible. This rebuttal proffers a strange theory of governance, that American accounts are somehow bound by the lifetime of its generations. But well into this century, the United States was still paying out pensions to the heirs of Civil War soldiers. We honor treaties that date back some 200 years, despite no one being alive who signed those treaties. Many of us would love to be taxed for the things we are solely and individually responsible for. But we are American citizens, and thus bound to a collective enterprise that extends beyond our individual and personal reach. It would seem ridiculous to dispute invocations of the Founders, or the Greatest Generation, on the basis of a lack of membership in either group. We recognize our lineage as a generational trust, as inheritance, and the real dilemma posed by reparations is just that: a dilemma of inheritance. It is impossible to imagine America without the inheritance of slavery.
I will read this. Thank you.
 
@fishonjazz am I the only one equally intrigued and scared of what the answer is?
Ya at first glance I was thinking fist would be worse then, assuming HaxOrs is straight, I had to reconsider.

Either way, poor gameface

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
 
Back
Top