doubledribble
Member
... the Jazz try to resign Marvin to a long-term contract and trade Kanter+ their 2014 pick for a higher 2014 pick?
Marvin is versatile : if the Jazz draft a SF he can play a stretch 4, if the Jazz draft a big he can easily slide in the role of the third big/bigger SF. Marvin will probably end up being cheaper than resigning Kanter, while fitting much better with Favors and Hayward. In addition, he is still young, plays defense and generally seems to be a steady, high-character guy.
Kanter simply does not have an ideal body to play a defined position ( C? PF?) and probably always will be somewhat fragile mentally... and we already have Hayward with his perennial ups and downs.
Thoughts?
Marvin is versatile : if the Jazz draft a SF he can play a stretch 4, if the Jazz draft a big he can easily slide in the role of the third big/bigger SF. Marvin will probably end up being cheaper than resigning Kanter, while fitting much better with Favors and Hayward. In addition, he is still young, plays defense and generally seems to be a steady, high-character guy.
Kanter simply does not have an ideal body to play a defined position ( C? PF?) and probably always will be somewhat fragile mentally... and we already have Hayward with his perennial ups and downs.
Thoughts?