Would you do this?
- Thread starter Chargers Jazz Angels
- Start date
Chargers Jazz Angels
Well-Known Member
This isn't a made up trade it was presented as ainge approaching the jazz. The point is do ou give up the rebuild to take a shot at a chmpionship. Let's say Orlando approached with an offer for Howard and he would re-sign with us.
Chargers Jazz Angels
Well-Known Member
I will say that rondo is better then Harris. Pierce is one of the best sf in the game add that to the talent we already have. Improve 2 positions with out losing any of your talent on your starters is pretty impressive.
Chargers Jazz Angels
Well-Known Member
That's kind of my point. And I don't want ray Allen any more way to old
Chargers Jazz Angels
Well-Known Member
I wouldn't give them that high of a pick. Honestly how many years do you think Nash has left? Don't get me wrong Nash is an upgrade.
You've got to be Sh***ing me.
m3at
Active Member
WAY more enticing.
But still not enticing at all. Not even marginally.
freakazoid
Well-Known Member
Yes, well, that's a lot more realistic. Just as long as we're not makin' stuff up.
Stifle Tower
Punch Bowl Re-Filler
Didn't like the Rondo/Pierce scenario. Utah would be giving up WAY too much. But I might do the Nash deal. Nash has a few years left and there's no guarantee Utah gets the pick. In that case, KOC would need to use the Memo TPE on a wing, instead of relying on the draft. Maybe even resign Howard. It's not like we'll resign Harris, so we're essentially trading one deal for another. The upgrade at PG is worth a later lottery pick. But Nash wants to retire in Phoenix; he'd never agree to the the deal.Xthren said:
I don't know if anyone has said this yet, but no.
I would not do that trade.
I would not do that trade.
Hell NO!!!!!!
Pierce can barely stay healthy. Rondo is not worth giving up Favors, Burks, Harris and GS pick considering Pierce might not be able to stay healthy considering his age and number of games he has played. I like what the Jazz are doing. Be Patient. The rookies are not ready to take over but in a few years they will and we will still have Millsap who will be younger than Pierce. I think what you do is develop/play your young guys and surround them with the needed veterans when you are serious contenders. The Jazz are not serious contenders this year.
Pierce can barely stay healthy. Rondo is not worth giving up Favors, Burks, Harris and GS pick considering Pierce might not be able to stay healthy considering his age and number of games he has played. I like what the Jazz are doing. Be Patient. The rookies are not ready to take over but in a few years they will and we will still have Millsap who will be younger than Pierce. I think what you do is develop/play your young guys and surround them with the needed veterans when you are serious contenders. The Jazz are not serious contenders this year.
Even Kim Kardashian would say "Over My Dead Booty" to this trade.
Grandpa Jazz
Active Member
This trade would reduce our roster to 12 players leave us with 5 small forwards no back up power forward and no backup shooting guard. It unbalances the roster. And it would fall way short of guaranteeing an improvement as a team much less being a title contender. This area of the NBA is best left to the front office, the professionals. Always someone is proposing trades just because they have the hots for a certain player.
orangello
Well-Known Member
Pierce was one of the best SF's in the game, and that is giving him way too much credit IMO. I like Rondo more than Harris. Harris has a better shot, but Rondo's aggressiveness would be great for the young guys. I would rather see Garnett on the Jazz just to teach Favors/Hayward/Kanter/Burks how to intimidate and play hard defense. I still wouldn't do that though because Garnett as a $21,247,044 teacher is too much to swallow. It is expiring though.
She would be alot hotter if she stopped talking. Forever.