What's new
By:

Would you rather have Hayward or Matthews?

l Abach l

l Abach l

Well-Known Member
Wes is getting paid 5 Million... Hayward is demanding more than 10 Million... Thoughts? I personally would rather have Matthews.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MVP
Hayward is definitely the better all around player. Higher basketball IQ, better passer, ect.......

Wes is a good role playing shooting guard.
 
TheSilencer1313 said:
Hayward is definitely the better all around player. Higher basketball IQ, better passer, ect.......

Wes is a good role playing shooting guard.
Click to expand...

Isn't that what Hayward is though? I honestly see his ceiling as a good role playing shooting guard. Anyone else who see's him as more than that has the homer goggles on...
 
l Abach l said:
Isn't that what Hayward is though? I honestly see his ceiling as a good role playing shooting guard. Anyone else who see's him as more than that has the homer goggles on...
Click to expand...

I see him in that same light too. Problem is he can't make shots, but he does play hard as hell.
 
l Abach l said:
Isn't that what Hayward is though? I honestly see his ceiling as a good role playing shooting guard. Anyone else who see's him as more than that has the homer goggles on...
Click to expand...

I disagree.
G-Time can run an offense, and Matthews is not suited for that role.

I've lost my homer glasses for the day, but can still see Hayward is a playmaker. Wes is not.
 
Matthews is perfect SG. Tough defender, great shooter. What is Hayward and why he is better though? Because he can pass a bit and blocks occasional shot? But look at his TO's and FG%. His AST/TO ratio is terrible. Shooting like crap. Sorry but I take Matthews great shooting and defense with his limitations over Haywards"versatility" any day.
 
TheSilencer1313 said:
I disagree.
G-Time can run an offense, and Matthews is not suited for that role.

I've lost my homer glasses for the day, but can still see Hayward is a playmaker. Wes is not.
Click to expand...

And why Wes would need to be a playmaker when they have Lillard?
 
Tonight I pick Matthews. Check back tomorrow for updates.
 
If you swapped Hayward and Wes this year, Hayward would be putting up an efficient 16/4/4, while Wes would look like a bench SG. Wes can't create anything whatsoever for other players, and he can barely create for himself. He's a great 3 and D guy on a good team. Hayward would be a great 3rd option offense creator on a good team.

Although if it was Wes for 5 vs Hayward for 10, I'd take Wes, just because that's a damn bargain.
 
cjs55 said:
If you swapped Hayward and Wes this year, Hayward would be putting up an efficient 16/4/4, while Wes would look like a bench SG. Wes can't create anything whatsoever for other players, and he can barely create for himself. He's a great 3 and D guy on a good team. Hayward would be a great 3rd option offense creator on a good team.

Although if it was Wes for 5 vs Hayward for 10, I'd take Wes, just because that's a damn bargain.
Click to expand...

These things

dat jazzfanz.com mobile app doe
 
bad question.

Wes Matthews at 5-6 mil a year vs Hayward at 11 mil a year

It's Wes and its not even close.
 
cjs55 said:
If you swapped Hayward and Wes this year, Hayward would be putting up an efficient 16/4/4, while Wes would look like a bench SG. Wes can't create anything whatsoever for other players, and he can barely create for himself. He's a great 3 and D guy on a good team. Hayward would be a great 3rd option offense creator on a good team.
.
Click to expand...

Woulda, should, coulda.... we heard same excuses last year when comparing to P.George. Homers were saying that given same minutes GH will produce same numbers like PG. We see how did that turned out. Enough excuses. If he would be that much better he would play like a star and not like garbage no matter the team or coach.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top