We act like the Blazers are ****ed just cuz they lost to the Warriors twice in a row. They just have to not start the season so poorly.
Sent from my A0001 using JazzFanz mobile app
Sent from my A0001 using JazzFanz mobile app
Would you take lillard if...
- Thread starter Chargers Jazz Angels
- Start date
And if the Blazers are really that desperate to clear cap room, they have 3 first round picks in a deep draft. They don't have to deal Lillard or CJ.
Sent from my A0001 using JazzFanz mobile app
Sent from my A0001 using JazzFanz mobile app
I'm sure Brooklyn would gladly take Crabbe and a first round pick
Sent from my A0001 using JazzFanz mobile app
Sent from my A0001 using JazzFanz mobile app
MDAV28
Well-Known Member
Well the issue here is how you feel about the roster then. Their cap situation IS terrible, it's a fact, but if you feel the players are worth it and can lead them to contention (or be used as assets) then sure you wouldn't think they are in a bad spot. I don't feel that way at all.
"Portland had the makings of a "big three" and with Nurkic on the roster after the All-Star break it briefly sported the NBA'sfourth ranked offense and ninth ranked defense*."
I think Portland is fairly optimistic.
Sent from my A0001 using JazzFanz mobile app
I think Portland is fairly optimistic.
Sent from my A0001 using JazzFanz mobile app
D
Deleted member 5000
Guest
Lillard plays so well in SLC... I wouldn't take 2 horrible contracts for him though!
George Hill man I love him, he fits so well on our team - hits clutch shots, shoots over 40% from 3pt, keeps it classy but he wants that $$$
George Hill man I love him, he fits so well on our team - hits clutch shots, shoots over 40% from 3pt, keeps it classy but he wants that $$$
They did what they had to with the pieces they had. This is the best way they could contend. Letting assets go in hopes of being able to sign better ones later is too risky when you aren't free agent spot.
Olshey has shown skill as gm with drafting and trades. They are fine.
Sent from my A0001 using JazzFanz mobile app
MDAV28
Well-Known Member
They didn't do what they had to do. They signed Turner to an atrocious deal, Leonard and Crabbe look to be on pretty bad deals too. Their tax bill in 2018-19 after not clearing space for Nurkic as you suggest would be out of this world. Like at LEAST $100 million in just luxury tax. They are not fine.
Idk how many times I have to say it, paying the luxury tax concerns 1 person: The owner. If the owner is willing to pay it, I see no reason to worry about it. I'm sure Olshey talked to him before he signed these contracts. It's not like the LT just crept on them out of nowhere.
They used their cap space when they had it to get the assets the felt suited their team and to not lose their RFA. They have plenty of flexibility with trades if they want, and they dont have to give up any of their top 3 players. They have one of the youngest rosters in the NBA. I would be optimistic as a Blazers fan. People way overvalue cap space.
I thought so too, but the numbers the Blazers put up with him in their lineup were top 10 in offense and defense. Maybe not sustainable, but it's reason for optimism for their team moving forward.
MDAV28
Well-Known Member
Ok let me know when he pays over $100 million luxury tax bill for a good but not great roster. (Pst... he won't)
Also they have no flexibility with trades. That's what cap space gives you.
Turner is, Leonard isn't.
10 million a year for the next 3 years is hardly that big of a deal. I'd rather have Leonard than Alec Burks.
Then how did they make that huge trade for Nurkic
3 1st round picks in a strong draft. Olshey is a smart dude. I doubt he just walked into those contracts blind without a plan.
MDAV28
Well-Known Member
Then how did they make that huge trade for Nurkic
3 1st round picks in a strong draft. Olshey is a smart dude. I doubt he just walked into those contracts blind without a plan.
Making a trade doesn't mean you have trade flexibility. Of course you CAN trade, you just don't have as many options and as much of a market without cap space, which is important for a team that doesn't project to be a contender.
So the plan is to use the 1st rounders to dump those contracts he signed? He signed bad deals, and now they are in a bad spot because of it. His plan was for the contracts to work out and/or be tradeable.
No, but he can if that is what the owner wants. If the owner doesnt care about footing a bill then have a lot of draft picks in a good draft. I dont think they need to sign anyone to become a better team. They have a lot of room for improvement just within the team.
framer
Well-Known Member
Nobody is paying a 100 million dollar 1 year luxury tax bill. Not even Golden State. 100 million isn't pocket change for anybody. That is a quarter of the way to a self-financed arena. That is a big deal, because if you are regularly dropping 100 million on the luxury tax, people aren't going to public finance your next arena.
Flexibility an be overrated if it just means holding your dick waiting for something to happen (as seen by the Jazz). Olshey got in there and started ****ing.
framer
Well-Known Member
The end of the season is a strange creature with some teams jockeying for position, some teams tanking, and others resting players. We will need an entire season to get to the truth of where they stand.