What's new

Checketts: Jazz targeting Winslow and Johnson... May trade down if they can't get either...

If we get Winslow without giving up a core player I would be stoked. This years pick, okc pick and warriors pick for Winslow if he slips a little.
 
Sure they can... or journalists can make **** up...

Let me put it this way - what is the chance the Jazz release truthful information to a journalist 3 hours before the draft, truthful information that would require you to trade up and would give out who you are targeting at said position?

I call BS. The Jazz are one of the most tight lipped organizations in the league and anything they leak would be calculated and most probably a smokescreen.

They have become more open in the last 2 years. DL is not as tight lipped as KOC was. More chatter the last two years than the previous 10.
 
I'd hold off on trading down if Turner or Kaminsky are there. If they're gone and they can still get Portis and a late 1st (Celtics?), then sure. If that enables them to roll dice on Looney then I get excited.

(Towns, Okafor, Russell, and Porzingis will definitely be gone; Winslow and Johnson [both who I am high on as well] have been accounted for; I don't love Mudiay, WCS's fit/health, Booker, don't like Payne, and hate Lyles)
 
I don't know. Everything that Checketts or Locke reports might just be a smokescreen. The real target might be someone else, Hezonja or Porz?
 
I'd give anything except the obvious guys for Winslow. I'd give Burke, 12, and some minor future picks for Johnson.
 
Hood + 12 would get to 8 probably. Detroit has a back-up PG they like.

Maybe Detroit comes away with Hood and Payne/Lyles.

Johnson IS expected to get to 8.

I'd rather Burks and 12 tbh. We need shooters and Hood is a shooter for sure.
 
Back
Top