What's new

Official Utah Jazz 2015-2016 Pre-Season Thread

With the way they are talking up Neto, it's seems a near guarantee he is at least above Cotton on the depth chart. I wouldn't be surprised if he is the Day 1 starter.
 
Well, given the pegs and holes are equivalent size like they are in the analogy, circles can fit in square holes and squares cant fit in circle holes.

This is why people call you contrarian. Because you try to argue/debate/correct over every single thing. Even when it is pointless and dumb. Have fun debating this unimportant topic that doesn't matter.
 
This is why people call you contrarian. Because you try to argue/debate/correct over every single thing. Even when it is pointless and dumb. Have fun debating this unimportant topic that doesn't matter.

Uhhh... sorry. Just trying to let you know the correct way to say something. It isn't a debate at all, it's just the way the idiom is said. Forgive me for trying to give you a heads up on something, I'm such a contrarian.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Square_peg_in_a_round_hole

https://plus.maths.org/content/peg-and-hole-puzzle-solution

Round peg in square hole actually is a better fit than square peg in square hole.
 
Uhhh... sorry. Just trying to let you know the correct way to say something. It isn't a debate at all, it's just the way the idiom is said. Forgive me for trying to give you a heads up on something, I'm such a contrarian.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Square_peg_in_a_round_hole

https://plus.maths.org/content/peg-and-hole-puzzle-solution

Round peg in square hole actually is a better fit than square peg in square hole.

And wasn't the original of this side tangent being Neto is a better fit than Burke? Burke can fit but not very well.

I said what I said on purpose.
 
You don't have to give me anything. Your opinion is irrelevant.

Good day.

It's not an opinion.........

There is a way to say the idiom, you said it wrong. Don't be the kid who runs home crying with the only basketball from the playground. Nothing like seeing the butthurt.
 
Well, given the pegs and holes are equivalent size like they are in the analogy, circles can fit in square holes and squares cant fit in circle holes.
Uh...You may want to take a remedial geometry class. Assuming size = area of round/square side of peg, neither a round peg in a square hole nor a square peg in a round hole works.
 
Uh...You may want to take a remedial geometry class. Assuming size = area of round/square side of peg, neither a round peg in a square hole nor a square peg in a round hole works.
Wrong.

Sent from my LG-E970 using Tapatalk
 
Assuming 100 square inches for each a square and a circle, the sides of the square would be sqrt(100) = 10 inches each. The diameter of the circle would be sqrt(100/pi) *2 = 11.28 inches.
 
Assuming 100 square inches for each a square and a circle, the sides of the square would be sqrt(100) = 10 inches each. The diameter of the circle would be sqrt(100/pi) *2 = 11.28 inches.
Right. So, the round peg doesn't fit the square hole.

The square peg is 14.14 inches from corner to opposite corner (sqrt(200)), and doesn't fit the round hole.

This isn't rocket science, Cy.
 
Back
Top