With the way they are talking up Neto, it's seems a near guarantee he is at least above Cotton on the depth chart. I wouldn't be surprised if he is the Day 1 starter.
Well, given the pegs and holes are equivalent size like they are in the analogy, circles can fit in square holes and squares cant fit in circle holes.
This is why people call you contrarian. Because you try to argue/debate/correct over every single thing. Even when it is pointless and dumb. Have fun debating this unimportant topic that doesn't matter.
Uhhh... sorry. Just trying to let you know the correct way to say something. It isn't a debate at all, it's just the way the idiom is said. Forgive me for trying to give you a heads up on something, I'm such a contrarian.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Square_peg_in_a_round_hole
https://plus.maths.org/content/peg-and-hole-puzzle-solution
Round peg in square hole actually is a better fit than square peg in square hole.
And wasn't the original of this side tangent being Neto is a better fit than Burke? Burke can fit but not very well.
I said what I said on purpose.
Doubtful, but I'll give it to you.
You don't have to give me anything. Your opinion is irrelevant.
Good day.
Uh...You may want to take a remedial geometry class. Assuming size = area of round/square side of peg, neither a round peg in a square hole nor a square peg in a round hole works.Well, given the pegs and holes are equivalent size like they are in the analogy, circles can fit in square holes and squares cant fit in circle holes.
Wrong.Uh...You may want to take a remedial geometry class. Assuming size = area of round/square side of peg, neither a round peg in a square hole nor a square peg in a round hole works.
Mississippi education...Wrong.
Right. So, the round peg doesn't fit the square hole.Assuming 100 square inches for each a square and a circle, the sides of the square would be sqrt(100) = 10 inches each. The diameter of the circle would be sqrt(100/pi) *2 = 11.28 inches.