What's new

Longest Thread Ever

I'll have to look for that. I'm not usually a fan a punishing kids for their parents actions/preferences/sins (if you must describe it that way).



If every human felt that way about every detail in their religion, there would be 7 billion religions in the world.

Well, I tried to give you rep for this attitude, but was told I needed to go out and pass out a lot of rep to less worthy folks first. . . . lol. . . . so I "reported" this post instead. Can't we just give rep to the people who put thought into their work in here?
 
all human relations involve some give and take, some "compromise" or adjustments. It's true of just two people, and it requires more concessions to gather larger groups into cohesive associations. We have a lot of single-issue groups that have essentially removed all objections to membership except support for a single idea or issue. . . .
 
Well, I tried to give you rep for this attitude, but was told I needed to go out and pass out a lot of rep to less worthy folks first. . . . lol. . . . so I "reported" this post instead. Can't we just give rep to the people who put thought into their work in here?

Even as an atheist, I don't think I've ever talked with another atheist who has exactly my view on metaphysics.
 
Even as an atheist, I don't think I've ever talked with another atheist who has exactly my view on metaphysics.

IMO, many "religious believers in God" do not actually believe in "God" as an sovereign Being, but merely as an authoritative validator of their own opinions. At least the true atheist is not that pathetic, although I would also have an opinion that a lot of atheist do turn to "authoritative" proponents of the idea for validation pretty much just like religionists referring to their scriptures. . . . .lol

Consequently, a statement like yours vets your capacity for independent thought. . . . good point to make if you can, about being unique.
 
Should I kick out the moolah and just have a private forum in here, with an undisclosed password?

that would allow me to use this site like I was just working on a "word" page not even connected to the internet. . . . so far as you guys are concerned. . . but I would still be on the NSA watchlist for old arguably senile rambling misfits goes..

the notion of a vast computer bank programmed to pick up on worrysome key words does invest a sort of sense of adventure to a diarrheic compulsive stream of consciousness writing mode. . . . just think, there's probably one person even being paid to evaluate me. . . .

maybe I should honk for him/her when I drive by those parked UHP cops at the gates of NSA's computer room on the hillside.
 
just in the spirit of being helpful, here are some key words NSA should be taking a serious look at"

Baseball. . . . .obviously a dead giveaway for patriotism, a cardinal sin in managed society.

Apple Pie . . . . .

Mom.

baby pics. . . . obviously associated with real men, indirectly as it may be.
 
Should I kick out the moolah and just have a private forum in here, with an undisclosed password?

Haha.. I'm intrigued by this.. what would we be discussing in there?


I've always thought of this thread as the place where we can discuss anything, but in reality that's not really the case since there are always 'taboo subjects'. A private forum for Babe would be interesting, we can ask Babe all sorts of 'embarrassing' questions... and see how he responds.. LOL
 
Haha.. I'm intrigued by this.. what would we be discussing in there?


I've always thought of this thread as the place where we can discuss anything, but in reality that's not really the case since there are always 'taboo subjects'. A private forum for Babe would be interesting, we can ask Babe all sorts of 'embarrassing' questions... and see how he responds.. LOL

well, you missed the point about the undisclosed password. It would be a place where I could talk to myself all day long, and have nobody listening except the NSA.
 
Back
Top