What's new
By:

Detroit to Explore PG Market with Injury to Jackson

I have to say that I like what I've seen from Mack thus far. I don't know that our point situation is all that solid right now with where Exum's at and with Hill's contract being somewhat nebulous.
 
Doc Cherno said:
I have to say that I like what I've seen from Mack thus far. I don't know that our point situation is all that solid right now with where Exum's at and with Hill's contract being somewhat nebulous.
Click to expand...

Mack has 1 year left on his deal. We can re-sign him next year if we really want to.
 
the only thing I'm interested in from them is picks. But, for obvious reasons I don't think Mack or Neto nets us a 1st rounder, and I think they have more value to our roster than a 2nd rounder.
 
Agree with Naos. Most 2nds don't even make rosters. Neto and Mack have both shown they can be decent backups. And if Hill doesn't return, Jazz might try to re-sign Mack
 
If they want to overpay and do a Mosgov-like Nuggets to Cavs overvalued trade then sure. But if not, nope.
 
NAOS said:
the only thing I'm interested in from them is picks. But, for obvious reasons I don't think Mack or Neto nets us a 1st rounder, and I think they have more value to our roster than a 2nd rounder.
Click to expand...

Can we trade Joe Johnson for draft picks?
 
Love it, we finally get the depth we have all been craving and our first impulse is to trade it away.

No. Ride with what we have for now.
 
Stoked said:
Love it, we finally get the depth we have all been craving and our first impulse is to trade it away.

No. Ride with what we have for now.
Click to expand...

I never said do the trade, I just brought it up because we have four PG's and I'm sure it's something that is being/has been discussed behind closed doors by Detroit and Utah.
 
Saint Cy of JFC said:
I never said do the trade, I just brought it up because we have four PG's and I'm sure it's something that is being/has been discussed behind closed doors by Detroit and Utah.
Click to expand...

And I didn't single you out. I used plural words such as "we" for a reason.
 
We're not getting a 1st for Mack. The better question is if Exum looks really good come January, what could we get for Hill? Let's face it. We're not winning it all this year but if the Pistons are willing to give up an unprotected 1st for Hill, then I think that's something we really need to consider. That would give us a ton of assets in what is a killer 2017 draft.
 
Cunning Linguist said:
We're not getting a 1st for Mack. The better question is if Exum looks really good come January, what could we get for Hill? Let's face it. We're not winning it all this year but if the Pistons are willing to give up an unprotected 1st for Hill, then I think that's something we really need to consider. That would give us a ton of assets in what is a killer 2017 draft.
Click to expand...

Jackson is supposed to be back before January.
 
With the potential new cba containing two way contracts between NBA and dleague I could see second round picks being much more valuable. If you can roster those extra guys you have more chances to find the diamond in the rough. Part of the reason we've sold picks was because we had no where to put these guys. I'd consider moving Mack for a good second rounder or a couple second rounders even if one is a few years away. Stack up those second rounders DL.
 
Cunning Linguist said:
We're not getting a 1st for Mack. The better question is if Exum looks really good come January, what could we get for Hill? Let's face it. We're not winning it all this year but if the Pistons are willing to give up an unprotected 1st for Hill, then I think that's something we really need to consider. That would give us a ton of assets in what is a killer 2017 draft.
Click to expand...

Hill will be a keeper long term. I think he's more likely to be on the roster in 12 months than burks.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top