What's new

Millsap's future impacts Jazz draft strategy

Would you trade Millsap + #3 to Cleveland for #1 or Minnesota's #2?

With Cleveland:
Utah would take Kyrie Irving @ #1 and have their guaranteed star PG of the future
Cleveland gets Millsap and could take Kanter and Knight at #3 and #4. Knight could be the PG of the future for Cleveland and he could learn under Baron Davis for a season or two. Kanter is a offensive-mind PF/C that they don't have, besides Jamison who will be traded for his expiring contract at some point next season.

With Minnesota:
Utah would take Derrick Williams, who is a perfect replacement for Millsap and beyond. Favors, Jefferson, and Williams would be a solid frontcourt.
Minnesota would get Enes Kanter at #3 and not look foolish for taking Kanter at #2 over Williams. Millsap could back-up the 3 and 4 and play alongside Love.
 
Using Millsap to move up to grab Williams makes sense for Utah for the same reason it doesn't make sense for Minnesota: We'd be making room for Williams while Millsap just logjams the 3/4 for Minnesota already.

I would consider moving Millsap to get Irving though. However, again, I don't know why Cleveland does that if they give a **** about Hickson or Jamison.

I really like Irving. He seems the most likely to be a franchise-player in this draft and that's why he's generally viewed as the #1 pick. I really like Millsap too and would hate to part with him, that's how much I like Irving.
 
Milsap should be our backup PF. Period. He is a great bench player. End of story.

Exactly. If his ego is gonna get in the way of this then it may be time to ship him out. Only way I would want Sap as a starter is if I had stars the level of a Miami/Boston etc. to surround him with.
 
Since nobody in the draft has any chance of replacing Millsap next year, there is no reason for Millsap to affect the draft. Worst case scenario is the best case scenario: someone proves they can replace Millsap and he, or someone else, gets dealt for more assets to clear the space.
 
Insanely tweener. Four ideal PFs spread between 3 positions. Insanely good would be finding a way (Jefferson and #12 for Bogut is a dream) to get an actual C one day.

I'm not really a fan of the tweener label in that scenario. Looking at some of Williams' film, he sure seems to be athletic enough to play the 3 IMO. At 6'8" that gives us great length coming from the SF spot. With Favors and Jefferson, neither may be an "actual" Center by the definition as we know it, but in all reality, the majority of NBA teams don't have an "actual" center.

Where we do agree is somebody like Bogut. As much as I love Jefferson, I would move him in some sort of package for Bog in a heartbeat. However, that is once again a bit redundant if Utah drafts Kanter. Who's your starting SF out of Favors, Bogut, Milsap and Kanter?

That's why I keep coming back to Derrick Williams as Utah's best case scenario.
 
I remember reading a comment from Millsap regarding playing SF, leading me to think this subject had been brought up to him by the Jazz brass. Millsap responded to a reporter's inquiry that if the Jazz wanted to use him at SF next year, they needed to let him know BEFORE the summer break and not wait 'til the 2011 season starts to tell him. Personally, I think with his work ethic he could do it by dropping some weight and working on his flexability and agility with drills, etc. The man does want to succeed, so he'll do what it takes to help the team win. He may not be quite as agile as some SF, but his low-post work and rebounding advantage would more than offset. At PF, he is night-in and night-out physically overmatched by other teams' starting PF's.
 
I'm not really a fan of the tweener label in that scenario. Looking at some of Williams' film, he sure seems to be athletic enough to play the 3 IMO. At 6'8" that gives us great length coming from the SF spot. With Favors and Jefferson, neither may be an "actual" Center by the definition as we know it, but in all reality, the majority of NBA teams don't have an "actual" center.

Where we do agree is somebody like Bogut. As much as I love Jefferson, I would move him in some sort of package for Bog in a heartbeat. However, that is once again a bit redundant if Utah drafts Kanter. Who's your starting SF out of Favors, Bogut, Milsap and Kanter?

That's why I keep coming back to Derrick Williams as Utah's best case scenario.

Get Kyrie Irving somehow. Problem solved!
 
Sap is not a SF and he is not a starter on good team. He is a great 6th man and his production versus what he is paid is very good. I see no reason the Jazz will trade him.
 
-Al Jefferson's scoring ability and low-post presence basically forces you to start him. Not only that, as the roster currently sits he is Utah's best player.
Al Jefferson's scoring ability is below league average. And, he can't make useful passes out of the post. Why people continue to repeat this garbage, I don't understand. I'd post the stats, but I've already done so far too many times.

Al Jeff should head to the bench if there's a log jam. The Jazz are much better off with a frontcourt of Favors-Millsap than anything including Big Al. I'm still hopeful Millsap comes back after the summer ready to play the 3.
 
Al Jefferson's scoring ability is below league average. And, he can't make useful passes out of the post. Why people continue to repeat this garbage, I don't understand. I'd post the stats, but I've already done so far too many times.

Al Jeff should head to the bench if there's a log jam. The Jazz are much better off with a frontcourt of Favors-Millsap than anything including Big Al. I'm still hopeful Millsap comes back after the summer ready to play the 3.

Maybe I don't quite understand what your saying but Al averaged 19 points, thats not below league average. I hope Big Al really improves his passing and then comes back next year, is an all star and cant wait for the Big Al supporters to jump on the band wagon b/c it seems I'm the only one who thinks he is good
 
Back
Top