What's new

The official "let's impeach Trump" thread

Meh have a good day. I'll respectfully acknowledge everyone else but I truthfully have no respect for you on politics. You add nothing. All you do is belittle now for the love of Exum stop being annoying and quoting me. Please. No hard feelings but please.
You cried quick that time. Kudos

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
 
Are you talking about the woman that is STILL trying to convince everyone that she has Indian ancestry even after every single one of her stories have been "ground into the dirt" disproven? Yeah, she would totally come clean in any investigation. . .
Just for you.
https://www.apnews.com/fc83ec71fab84dbd8180c9aae0a1689c

Democratic presidential candidate Elizabeth Warren offered a public apology Monday to Native Americans over her past claim to tribal heritage, directly tackling an area that’s proved to be a big political liability.

“Like anyone who has been honest with themselves, I know I have made mistakes,” the Massachusetts senator said at a forum on Native American issues in this pivotal early voting state. “I am sorry for the harm I have caused.”


That was back in August.
All it took was a quick Google search. I clicked on the first article that came up.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
 
Borderline Insane
ngc0evv.png

QmY46yR.png

Izf195B.png
 
Borderline Insane
ngc0evv.png

QmY46yR.png

Izf195B.png
I agree that it's insane how often you need to be corrected. Maybe don't be such an inaccurate poster and you wouldn't see that.

Like if you said there wasn't enough evidence found to convict Trump of collusion with Russia then I either wouldn't quote you or I would quote you and say I agree.
But you keep saying nothing happened from the Russia investigation. So I explain you are wrong.
Then you freak out and start playing the victim card.

It's insane

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
 
Did Trump collude with Russia?

Yes or No?

Does every person investigated for every crime get convicted?

Don't try to move the goalposts here, this was about the propriety of the investigation, not whether or not he was eventually found guilty.
 
The easiest target is Hillary.

But then we can move on to ANY PERSON in this thread that's expressed an opinion dissenting from your own.
What is Hillary guilty of? I really don't know. I've never said she's guilty of anything more than her employees smashing phones, and whitewashing hard drives which did happen. If I'm wrong by all means.
 
Does every person investigated for every crime get convicted?

Don't try to move the goalposts here, this was about the propriety of the investigation, not whether or not he was eventually found guilty.
To you maybe. I've having different conversations here but I was talking about the presumption of innocence. You... You are presuming guilt with no guilty verdict. That's on you, not me. I don't wish that on my worst enemy. I think it's you moving the post here.
 
I agree that it's insane how often you need to be corrected. Maybe don't be such an inaccurate poster and you wouldn't see that.

Like if you said there wasn't enough evidence found to convict Trump of collusion with Russia then I either wouldn't quote you or I would quote you and say I agree.
But you keep saying nothing happened from the Russia investigation. So I explain you are wrong.
Then you freak out and start playing the victim card.

It's insane

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
This was the conversation I was having, you came and got all but hurt. I specifically say collision. Its right there. I even bolded it so people wouldn't mistake what I'm saying for hell sakes. Sorry bro but duh.


So if someone makes up some false allegations that Warren colluded with Russia, you're ok with 3 years of investigations and 30+ million dollars wasted? As I've said nothing came out of that. Remember I'm talking about Warren and Collusion, not interference. Let's make that clear.
 
This was the conversation I was having, you came and got all but hurt. I specifically say collision. Its right there. I even bolded it so people wouldn't mistake what I'm saying for hell sakes. Sorry bro but duh.
That part where you say nothing came out of that is incorrect. I corrected you. Also the part about the wasted time and money was incorrect. You're welcome.
It's not wasted money. It's not a wasted investigation. People were caught committing crimes thanks to the investigation. That's a good thing.

Correcting someone doesn't equal butt hurt btw.
Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
 
Last edited:
What is Hillary guilty of? I really don't know. I've never said she's guilty of anything more than her employees smashing phones, and whitewashing hard drives which did happen. If I'm wrong by all means.

You are.
Perhaps

My stance this entire time is unless we're going to go all in a go after all of our corrupt officials than I'm not going to lose sleep or in the lefts case go obsessive compulsive over this stuff. If we're going to drain the swamp let's drain the entire thing. The right are not the only ones that are willing to look past corruption as long as it fits their partisanship. The left is just as guilty. Hillary is a prime example. Her employees destroyed phones and emails. She was the lefts candidate.

This picking and choosing is nothing short of not really giving a ****. Me, I think it's pointless if we aren't going to hold ourselves accountable. That's why I brush it off. This isn't about crime. This is strictly partisanship.

Sure sure
 
Back
Top