What's new
By:

Miami Holiday Massacre

Rate the front office moves.

  • Loved it, shows the organisation is serious.

    Votes: 17 45.9%

  • Hated it, burnt a vet and trade Exum for a bloke that don't fit in the system.

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Up for dealing Exum but didn't see the piano landing on Green

    Votes: 9 24.3%

  • Well something needed to happen the bench was an omnishambles

    Votes: 14 37.8%

  • Moving Exum was a good idea but shouldn't have dealt the picks. Green was never making the differen

    Votes: 1 2.7%

  • other

    Votes: 3 8.1%
  • Total voters
    37
Rubashov

Rubashov

Well-Known Member
2019 Award Winner
So we've all seen the front office show themselves as a bunch of ruthless assassins prepared to take dudes out the back like the old school KGB. So its time for a poll. How do you feel about it?
 
Loved that the organization didn't sit on their hands. Was okay with the Exum for Clarkson trade after letting it marinate in the brain box. Hated waiving Green when we had inexperienced non-rotation players we don't plan on ever having in the rotation that we could've waived.
 
Last edited:
It was way past time to get off ex's contract.
I'm in the school of thought Green wasn't happy with the organization so I'll say that was a good move also. The way the bench was playing something had to happen.
 
The Jeff Green waive is strange. I wonder if it is a sign of friction/misalignment between Snyder and front office. It could be that front office wants to see more of the young players and coach preferred to stick with the vets. If the front office wanted to force the development of Brantly and Niang then this is the type of move you make. Will be interesting to see if TB gets more playing time over Davis in the coming weeks.
 
I'd call it the opposite of ruthless.

The Jazz are an org that caters to washed up vets because they are scared of getting a bad name among other players.
 
checkbookdoc said:
The Jeff Green waive is strange. I wonder if it is a sign of friction/misalignment between Snyder and front office. It could be that front office wants to see more of the young players and coach preferred to stick with the vets. If the front office wanted to force the development of Brantly and Niang then this is the type of move you make. Will be interesting to see if TB gets more playing time over Davis in the coming weeks.
Click to expand...
It was strange, but it's also the same thing that happened with Joe Johnson. The Jazz played him til the end they agreed to part ways.
 
I think both moves signal QS's rising power in the organization or upper management's acknowledgement that some of the decisions they made were incorrect.

Either way it's a good thing.
 
candrew said:
I think both moves signal QS's rising power in the organization or upper management's acknowledgement that some of the decisions they made were incorrect.

Either way it's a good thing.
Click to expand...
The idea of a conflict between Snyder and the FO does make sense. I can see with Quin not playing Dante, this was a submission to Quin. But the waiving of Green seems to signal a FO power play.
 
The Jazz needed scoring off of the bench and Clarkston will provide that. Green was a huge minus for the bench, and the Jazz have promising young players that couldn't possibly be as bad. I can't wait to see Brantley get some minutes

Sent from my SM-G965U using JazzFanz mobile app
 
I'm just wondering how the GLeague guy factors into this. Is Quin going to expand his rotation to 11-12 guys to keep guys fresh or is the guy destined for duty with the Stars.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top