What's new

Coronavirus

Can anyone tell me what ingredient they are using to deliver the mRNA to the cell? It's my understanding that mRNA dies on contact with almost anything including oxygen, saliva, blood. So what are they using to protect that mRNA as it travels through the body and into the cell?

It's also my understanding that the material they're using is not listed on the ingredients list, why?

“My understanding” lmfao. Hack the Scientist. You can’t make this **** up. The vaccine is basically 99.8% effective against death and there are no serious side effects and he’s going to use his “advanced knowledge” on the topic and question it.

Class, I hope everyone is listening. Hack is going to present now regarding his expertise on the Covid vaccine.
 
I guess the problem is, we know what the Chinese are using in their PEGylated lipid, it's graphine oxide....That's a fact.

What are Moderna and Pfizer using? We don't know as it's proprietary.
 
“My understanding” lmfao. Hack the Scientist. You can’t make this **** up. The vaccine is basically 99.8% effective against death and there are no serious side effects and he’s going to use his “advanced knowledge” on the topic and question it.

Class, I hope everyone is listening. Hack is going to present now regarding his expertise on the Covid vaccine.
You know how we know you're DAF? 85% of Israeli adults have been vaccinated, 95% of current Israeli hospitalizations are vaccinated.

Bitch, I could be the dean of the UofU medical school and you wouldn't know better
 
Again,

Interesting, there is a PEGylated lipid that is proprietary for both Moderna and Pfizer which is not required to be listed on the ingredient list. It would be interesting to find out what they attached to the polyethylene glycol but they're not required to tell us.
I'm not entirely sure of your motive here. You clearly are calling this a lipid, and I've provided you a list of lipids, twice. You don't know what you're looking for, but insist it's there and NOT already in the provided list, and they don't have to list it.

So you can't identify what you want, insist something's there that isn't listed, and are also sure that what's listed isn't it. Your link doesn't mention the word "proprietary" at all, and reuters debunked this claim a couple weeks back. The sample provided to the Spaniard testing it could not verify it's origin. (July 23rd)

The allegations are based on an analysis by a professor in Spain which has been rejected by experts. He obtained what he himself described as non-conclusive results after studying one vial. He said the vial was purported to contain a dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine but said it had come to him by a messenger service and acknowledged that the vial’s origin was unknown.

Be honest. Were you honestly mislead, or just trying to spread misinformation so you can skirt a needle prick?
 
Also note, she's been banned from Twitter for continued misleading(read; false) posts.
Maybe she was banned for posting the truth.

Here's some stuff about vaccines in general.


Have you checked out this info?

(post #5,072)
 

Dr. Peter McCullough - URGENT WARNING About Poisonous Jabs - "An Agonizing Situation"​





I HAD THE COVID VACCINE - DON'T GET VACCINATED. STAND YOUR GROUND​

 
Last edited:
Maybe she was banned for posting the truth.

Here's some stuff about vaccines in general.


Have you checked out this info?

(post #5,072)
A quick eyeball at the first couple sites seems not terrible. But a whois tells me the owners of the domains are deeply religious, and have a history of publishing... alternative facts? Deeply slanted opinions, and the first couple articles refer to findings that aren't peer reviewed. I'd have to alter my stance significantly if they worked honest, transparent, and had a better reputation.

As far as banned for posting the truth goes, that's unlikely. It's not like there's one guy at twitter trying to hide the truth. They're VERY lenient, and it takes a lot of continued effort. Look at how many violations Trump had before they really did anything about it.

Get me something reputable, and I'll go over it.
 
Interestigly enough, Facebook reminded me of this today

“Listening to experts to set policy is an elitist approach and I’m very fearful of an elitist approach,” he said. “I’m also fearful that it leads to totalitarianism, especially when you say, ‘Well. We’re doing it for the public good.’”

Ya gotta love our neighbors to the north.
 
the first couple articles refer to findings that aren't peer reviewed.
Peer-review is as corrupt as the media* are.

MEDICAL JOURNALS CORRUPT TO THE CORE!
https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/medical-journals-corrupt-to-the-core/


According to these two doctors peer review is under the same control that the media are under. Start watching at around the 31:45 time mark.

Dr Tenpenny and Dr. Lee Merritt - The Medical Industry Has Now Been Weaponized​



Here's another doctor that says peer-review is corrupt. Start watching at the 34:50 time mark.

NY coronavirus doctor: Faith in ‘sociopaths’ like Fauci ‘a very foolish choice’


*
 
anyone who uses big pharm funded reuters and wiksleezia as references has no credibility
Heh…

 
Heh…

Let it be known. If I personally ever use a source that says "fact checker" on it I would like you to completely dismiss my point as false and call me an idiot. You have my permission. I might as well use tabloids and computer parts magazines ffs.
 
Last edited:
Heh…

But Red, when they say bias, they mean bias against their prejudices. Not skewed from all reality.

Think of it like their problem is with reality, and demonstrated fact.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Red
But Red, when they say bias, they mean bias against their prejudices. Not skewed from all reality.

Think of it like their problem is with reality, and demonstrated fact.
Lolol you all need a website to tell you what is fact or fiction. Grown *** adults that can't decipher truth from reality
 


His plan.......



Lol covid is hilarious!!! Lol morons.

Well, the plan is technically sound as it's really the CDC's plan regardless of administration:

1. Socially distance
2. Wear masks
3. Practice good hygiene
4. Contact trace
5. Get the vaccine

A plan only goes so far as everyone being onboard with the plan and with so many state and local municipalities doing their own thing, no wonder we're still a mess to a degree. Quin could draw up the greatest zone scheme ever, but if Conley/Mitchell say 'Screw it, I'm playing man and you can't stop me.', we should expect the L.

And it's not a red vs. blue thing. For all the handwringing pointing at DeSantis and his mismanagement of Florida as of late, you can just as easily look westward at California and Newsom's incompetence in only seeming to follow the science insofar as it affects his confidence that he's not going to get recalled. Standard politicians doing politicians thing and being a purveyor of not liking politicians generally, they're all inclusive in our inability to progress faster.

The good news is much of our vulnerable population is vaccinated - deaths and hospitalizations are much lower thanks to the heroic efforts of our medical community and remain that way for the foreseeable future. It's also irrefutable that the vaccines have kept these numbers low which show that they work - yes, we don't know the long-term effects, but the plan is working in a kind-of/sort-of way, but one also gets the sense that we're simply biding time right now barreling to a sketchy future.
 
Back
Top