I haven't watched a lot of them this year, but I sure hope so. They didn't look very good outside of SGA.OKC can definitely play a lot better than they did.
I haven't watched a lot of them this year, but I sure hope so. They didn't look very good outside of SGA.OKC can definitely play a lot better than they did.
We could easily draft Miller at 9th imo if he slides like I am expecting. Keyonte is a top 6 lock barring being at a murder scene and squeeling tot he prosection to save himself. imo and we are not drafting Keonte either if we jump to 1-4.I just hope we’re bad enough to grab Keyonte George.. Brandon Miller is out of the question now,
Brandon Miller got a higher chance of going #2 than dropping below 3We could easily draft Miller at 9th imo if he slides like I am expecting. Keyonte is a top 6 lock barring being at a murder scene and squeeling tot he prosection to save himself. imo and we are not drafting Keonte either if we jump to 1-4.
The only reason the prosecution has a case is with Millers testimony, so he was not charged.
f that college star soon to be NBA bum -snitches get stiches
Change it to #4 and I'd agree. If his school and the police don't care about the incident he had I think most NBA teams aren't gonna be all that worried.Brandon Miller got a higher chance of going #2 than dropping below 3
right now sure, but its a long ways out ,and more info could surface. It is also not a bad thing if he falls to us lol.Brandon Miller got a higher chance of going #2 than dropping below 3
Apparently because they think it's the best/only viable rebuilding strategy, thus essentially equating tanking with rebuilding (ie you're not rebuilding unless you're tanking). That's where I think the difference of opinion lies.Why do those on team tank want to lose?
Nah, I think tankers think that the best way to increase the odds of having a better draft pick is to lose. And they think having a better draft pick is more likely to help the team get more talented than having a worse draft pick. I dont think anyone thinks losing is the only possible strategy. I think you are being silly.Apparently because they think it's the best/only viable rebuilding strategy, thus essentially equating tanking with rebuilding (ie you're not rebuilding unless you're tanking). That's where I think the difference of opinion lies.
Sent from my SM-G887N using JazzFanz mobile app
I'll stand by my statement. Tankers are convinced that a high pick is the path to the best possible rebuild -- among many tanking advocates so much so that any other strategy pales by comparison.Nah, I think tankers think that the best way to increase the odds of having a better draft pick is to lose. And they think having a better draft pick is more likely to help the team get more talented than having a worse draft pick. I dont think anyone thinks losing is the only possible strategy. I think you are being silly.
It's literally the definition. Losing is an essential part of the tanking strategy in US sports that base draft picks off the records of teams. Even in the NBA where there's a lottery system involved.I think the best evidence that tanking is primarily about losing