What's new

The Biden Administration and All Things Politics

Sadly, very few will recover from this. These are people who largely have comfortable lives and are inventing drama into their lives to distract them from the comfort, prosperity, and boredom of 21st century America. Rational, normal, sane, and well informed people can only hope to outvote these nuts. Most of them will just continue to dwell in their unhinged paranoia.
Pay attention. She knows her voters are too stupid to actually research her stances. PS Fish is blatantly lying about the scenario too. Anyone can make up a stupid story like that lol. I understand the uneducated don't read the constitution but here. I'll educated fish as I always do. Sad that fish has to lie and still look dumb

"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."


View: https://x.com/TrumpWarRoom/status/1836411228710662355?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1836411228710662355%7Ctwgr%5E3fa818c40b91e6339095694014eb8ab64eb4b43a%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Famericanmilitarynews.com%2F2024%2F09%2Fvideo-harris-supported-govt-entering-gun-owners-homes-to-inspect-firearms%2F
 
Last edited:
That is 2024 Kamala. This is 2019 Kamala:


...and she promised to get it done within her first 100 days via Executive Order.

I don't necessarily know if 2019 Kamala was the true Kamala or if 2024 Kamala is the true Kamala, but I don't think it is unfair for gun owners to have some doubts.
Whichever Kamala doesn't matter. I guarantee that she won't take your guns.

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
 
Sadly, very few will recover from this. These are people who largely have comfortable lives and are inventing drama into their lives to distract them from the comfort, prosperity, and boredom of 21st century America. Rational, normal, sane, and well informed people can only hope to outvote these nuts. Most of them will just continue to dwell in their unhinged paranoia.
Oh he is doing great. Despite being 80 and smoking pot each day and drinking about 10 beers per day (this is from my co worker) he is healthy and financially well off

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
 
Oh he is doing great. Despite being 80 and smoking pot each day and drinking about 10 beers per day (this is from my co worker) he is healthy and financially well off
Good for him. That's awesome. As for the critical thinking skills going downhill as people mature into old age, meh. That is just the way it is, and it isn't a right wing or left wing thing. We have a left-winger on this forum who is convinced one of the candidates is a fascist dictator who intends to throw liberals into ovens. I only hope those people are lucky enough in their lives to have someone younger keeping an eye out to make sure they don't fall for scams. If that is locked down then smoke 'em if you got 'em.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PJF
Going for the “big dicks” demographic…


View: https://x.com/atrupar/status/1847765368657363009
Classy. And super important issue for the voters.

Also probably BS. His lips were moving when he said it remember?
People shower with other golfers when they go golfing? I haven't golfed a ton (maybe 20 times) but I never heard of this phenomenon.

Sent from my OPD2203 using Tapatalk
 
  • Like
Reactions: Red
Classy. And super important issue for the voters.

Also probably BS. His lips were moving when he said it remember?
People shower with other golfers when they go golfing? I haven't golfed a ton (maybe 20 times) but I never heard of this phenomenon.

Sent from my OPD2203 using Tapatalk
Alright boys, that was an awesome round of golf, now it's time for my personal favorite part of the day, the communal shower where we literally measure dicks.
 


Though maybe some of the other things Musk was doing were of murky legality, this one is clearly illegal. See 52 U.S.C. 10307(c): “Whoever knowingly or willfully gives false information as to his name, address or period of residence in the voting district for the purpose of establishing his eligibility to register or vote, or conspires with another individual for the purpose of encouraging his false registration to vote or illegal voting, or pays or offers to pay or accepts payment either for registration to vote or for voting shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years, or both…” (Emphasis added.)
 


Though maybe some of the other things Musk was doing were of murky legality, this one is clearly illegal. See 52 U.S.C. 10307(c): “Whoever knowingly or willfully gives false information as to his name, address or period of residence in the voting district for the purpose of establishing his eligibility to register or vote, or conspires with another individual for the purpose of encouraging his false registration to vote or illegal voting, or pays or offers to pay or accepts payment either for registration to vote or for voting shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years, or both…” (Emphasis added.)
I wish our government had the guts to actually enforce this ****. We are seeing that legality is really defined as "whatever will actually be enforced" and finding that our legal system is effectively neutered when it comes to the enforcement of much of this stuff. We are a joke.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Red


Though maybe some of the other things Musk was doing were of murky legality, this one is clearly illegal. See 52 U.S.C. 10307(c): “Whoever knowingly or willfully gives false information as to his name, address or period of residence in the voting district for the purpose of establishing his eligibility to register or vote, or conspires with another individual for the purpose of encouraging his false registration to vote or illegal voting, or pays or offers to pay or accepts payment either for registration to vote or for voting shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years, or both…” (Emphasis added.)
Wow. It looks like you got him...except that your news source is lying in that Musk did not say that he would be giving $1 million away. He said that his Super PAC would be awarding $1 million. If the government wants to fine the Super PAC $10,000 for each award then do it. It'll just mean each award costs the Super PAC $1,010,000 instead of $1,000,000. As for the jail sentence, you can't throw a Super PAC corporate entity in jail.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PJF


Though maybe some of the other things Musk was doing were of murky legality, this one is clearly illegal. See 52 U.S.C. 10307(c): “Whoever knowingly or willfully gives false information as to his name, address or period of residence in the voting district for the purpose of establishing his eligibility to register or vote, or conspires with another individual for the purpose of encouraging his false registration to vote or illegal voting, or pays or offers to pay or accepts payment either for registration to vote or for voting shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years, or both…” (Emphasis added.)
Just some quid pro quo. Think Elon is doing this out of the kindness of his heart? He’s going to get everything he can out of Trump if he’s elected. The Bought and Paid for candidate.
 
I wish our government had the guts to actually enforce this ****. We are seeing that legality is really defined as "whatever will actually be enforced" and finding that our legal system is effectively neutered when it comes to the enforcement of much of this stuff. We are a joke.
I’ve been told many times on this very website that the Obama DOJ has been weaponized to persecute and prosecute poor innocent god fearing Republicans whose only crimes have been that they love America. So it’s weird to see you leftists complain about the DOJ being MIA on pretty ****ing obvious corruption on full display. Between them dragging their feet against Trump, this, and two Supreme Court justices making no secret about their corruption, what’s the point of having a DOJ? Is garland still alive?
 
So it’s weird to see you leftists complain about the DOJ being MIA on pretty ****ing obvious corruption on full display.
How about that! A tiny piece of agreement! I'm not talking about the first part because it is par for the course to see leftists complain about what they themselves are doing, but I do agree on the DOJ being MIA on pretty ****ing obvious corruption on full display. There is nothing corrupt about a man contributing his own money to a political organization whose purpose it is to register people to vote, but it is an entirely different story when the President steals other people's tax money via Executive Order to do that same thing. It is Executive Order 14019 and Biden should be in jail for it. What Musk is doing is philanthropy. What Biden is doing is government corruption.
 
Down the stretch he comes….

He has survived more scandals than any major party presidential candidate, much less president, in the life of the republic. Not only survived but thrived. He has turned them on their head, making allegations against him into an argument for him by casting himself as a serial victim rather than a serial violator.

His persecution defense, the notion that he gets in so much trouble only because everyone is out to get him resonates at his rallies where he says “they’re not coming after me, they’re coming after you, and I’m just standing in the way.” But that of course belies a record of scandal stretching across his 78 years starting long before politics. Whether in his personal life or his public life, he has been accused of so many acts of wrongdoing, investigated by so many prosecutors and agencies, sued by so many plaintiffs and claimants that it requires a scorecard just to remember them all.

Joseph R. Biden Jr.’s first bid for the presidency collapsed when he lifted some words from another politician’s speech. George W. Bush came close to losing after the last-minute revelation of a long-ago drunken-driving arrest. Hillary Rodham Clinton fell short at least in part because of an F.B.I. investigation into emails that led to no charges.

Not Mr. Trump. He has moved from one furor to the next without any of them sinking into the body politic enough to end his career. The unrelenting pace of scandals may in its own way help him by keeping any single one of them from dominating the national conversation and eroding his standing with his base of supporters.


Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
 
In 1973, the Justice Department sued the Trump family company for racial discrimination in renting apartments. Applications from Black applicants were marked C for “colored.” Mr. Trump fought the matter in court but ultimately agreed to a settlement that the Justice Department at the time called “one of the most far-reaching ever negotiated.”

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
 
Back
Top