What's new

Trump Dictatorship and All Things Politics

I didn’t realize that all the bluanon political folks here on jazzfanz were a bunch of sorority girls. I did not expect that…
As of the last election, the Democrat party became the party of Karen. The working class and Hispanic voters are now solidly in the Republican base. Black voters, especially Black-male voters, are shifting to the Republicans. The Democrats have unmarried college-educated White women on anti-depressants and simp male feminists. They are choosing the 20 side of every 80/20 issue in American politics. It is frankly stunning they still have as much influence as they do. If they keep doubling down on their overtly racist identity politics and transgender idiocy, they are going to keep sliding toward having only 20% of the voice in American government.

The funniest part is watching the few sane ones try to change course only to see newcomers like Jasmine Crockett mash the accelerator pedal as the party races toward the cliff.

Go Democrats! Go!
 
The American president is a POS.



No one can say they didn’t know.

During his first official campaign rally for the 2024 Republican nomination, held in Waco, Texas, Donald Trump vowed retribution against those he perceives as his enemies.

“I am your warrior,” he said to his supporters. “I am your justice. For those who have been wronged and betrayed, I am your retribution.”

Sixty days into Trump’s second term, we have begun to see what that looks like.

The president fired the archivist of the United States because he was enraged at the National Archives for notifying the Justice Department of his alleged mishandling of classified documents after he left office following his first term. (The archivist he fired hadn’t even been working for the agency at the time, but that didn’t matter.) He also fired two Democratic members of the Federal Trade Commission, a traditionally independent regulatory agency, in violation of Supreme Court precedent and quite likely the language of the statute that created it. (Both members plan to sue to reverse the firings.)


Trump stripped security details from people he had appointed to high office in his first administration and subsequently fell out with, including General Mark Milley, former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, former National Security Adviser John Bolton, the former diplomat Brian Hook, and the infectious-disease expert Anthony Fauci. The National Institutes of Health, where Fauci worked for 45 years, is being gutted by the Trump administration. The environment there has become “suffocatingly toxic,” as my colleague Katherine J. Wu reported.

Trump has sued networks and newspapers for millions of dollars. His Federal Communications Commission is investigating several outlets. And he has called CNN and MSNBC “corrupt” and “illegal”—not because they have broken any laws, but simply because they have been critical of him.

Trump’s FBI director, Kash Patel, told the MAGA podcaster Steve Bannon in a 2023 interview that “we’re going to come after the people in the media who lied about American citizens, who helped Joe Biden rig presidential elections—we’re going to come after you.”

Trump has also come after the legal profession, expanding his attacks on private law firms and threatening the ability of lawyers to do their job and private citizens to obtain legal counsel. U.S. Marshals have warned federal judges of unusually high threat levels as Elon Musk and other Trump-administration allies “ramp up efforts to discredit judges,” according to a Reuters report. On his social-media site, Musk has attacked judges in more than 30 posts since the end of January, calling them “corrupt,” “radical,” and “evil,” and deriding the “TYRANNY of the JUDICIARY.”

Earlier this week, Trump targeted a federal judge, James E. Boasberg, who ordered a pause in deportations being carried out under an obscure wartime law, the Alien Enemies Act of 1798. Trump, who ignored that court order, called the judge a “Radical Left Lunatic” and demanded his impeachment. (Chief Justice John Roberts responded to the president’s attack with a rare public rebuke.) Trump and his supporters are clearly looking for a showdown with the judicial branch, which could precipitate a constitutional crisis.​


But that’s hardly where the efforts at intimidation end. Trump’s antipathy for Ukraine and its president, Volodymyr Zelensky, was on vivid display a few weeks ago, when the president berated Zelensky in a televised Oval Office meeting. Trump’s hostility toward the Ukrainian president, whom he referred to as a “dictator,” is explained in part by his long-standing affinity for totalitarian leaders such as Vladimir Putin, who invaded Ukraine three years ago. But it almost surely also has to do with Trump’s embrace of a conspiracy theory that Ukraine intervened in the 2016 presidential election in an effort to defeat him. (In fact it was Russia, not Ukraine, that interfered in the election, and on behalf of Trump.)

Last Friday, in the Great Hall of the Justice Department, the president described his adversaries as “scum,” “savages,” and “Marxists,” as well as “deranged,” “thugs,” “violent vicious lawyers,” and “a corrupt group of hacks and radicals within the ranks of the American government.”

No one has any doubt what this means: The department is under Trump’s personal control. As if to underscore the point, Attorney General Pam Bondi, who called Trump “the greatest president in the history of our country,” said she works “at the directive of Donald Trump.” The Justice Department is Trump’s weapon for revenge. And his appetite for vengeance is insatiable.
 
Last edited:
Thing is, I'm open to arguments in favor of closing down the DOE, but none have been made. All this stuff is happening and no discussion is involved. What are the pros and cons of shutting down the DOE, because their obviously has to be both, pros and cons.

Can we have a discussion? Can a thoughtful reason be presented?
Because the programs will still need to be operated (loans, etc.) I doubt there will be a lot in savings other than some admin costs, but that could still be 5% or more. I have no issue closing departments if they can still be run properly through other departments.
 
As of the last election, the Democrat party became the party of Karen.
That party, the Democrats, that’s the party defending the American Constitution. Your own party, are cowards, terrified of a man who wishes to assume as much power over all his countrymen as possible. I’m no Karen, and neither are the Democrats. You, sir, are an enemy of our constitution, and an enemy of every good thing your nation ever stood for. You should be deeply ashamed of yourself, as should some of your fellow clueless MAGA posters. None of us who recognize, in the clear light of day, who Trump is, and what he represents would ever expect you to abandon your spineless opinions, none of us expect you to ever stop hating America’s ideals. Those ideals have been too naive at times, somewhat naive regarding the darker angels of our own human nature, but at least those you refer to as Karens have not sunk to your level of selling their souls to the devil, and spending his days pissing on those ideals….
 
Because the programs will still need to be operated (loans, etc.) I doubt there will be a lot in savings other than some admin costs, but that could still be 5% or more. I have no issue closing departments if they can still be run properly through other departments.
Serious policy makers would have discussions about specifics and how the transition of responsibilities would happen.

What we have is a chaotic mess of **** happening with little to no notice and everyone scrambling to figure out how to deal with it.
 
Serious policy makers would have discussions about specifics and how the transition of responsibilities would happen.

What we have is a chaotic mess of **** happening with little to no notice and everyone scrambling to figure out how to deal with it.
Agreed. The first step would be an analysis of actual savings and where the mandatory programs would be sent to and who would oversee them. All I have heard is pie in the sky.
 
As of the last election, the Democrat party became the party of Karen. The working class and Hispanic voters are now solidly in the Republican base. Black voters, especially Black-male voters, are shifting to the Republicans. The Democrats have unmarried college-educated White women on anti-depressants and simp male feminists. They are choosing the 20 side of every 80/20 issue in American politics. It is frankly stunning they still have as much influence as they do. If they keep doubling down on their overtly racist identity politics and transgender idiocy, they are going to keep sliding toward having only 20% of the voice in American government.

The funniest part is watching the few sane ones try to change course only to see newcomers like Jasmine Crockett mash the accelerator pedal as the party races toward the cliff.

Go Democrats! Go!
What percentage of the population wants a recession? You’re way too confident.
 
Along with being concerned about transgenic mice and being against people transitioning to a new phase in life (adulthood, different job, etc), trump is now firing anyone who is left handed.... or as trump calls them "lefties" or "leftists"

Just kidding. Would anyone actually be surprised if that were true though?
 
Along with being concerned about transgenic mice and being against people transitioning to a new phase in life (adulthood, different job, etc), trump is now firing anyone who is left handed.... or as trump calls them "lefties" or "leftists"

Just kidding. Would anyone actually be surprised if that were true though?
It would not surprise me in the least. And I am left-handed, therefore I must be a leftist. Yikes!!!
 
As of the last election, the Democrat party became the party of Karen.
Obviously, intellectually lazy posters saying things like that is just a way of avoiding unpleasant truths.

“Karens” from the world of science:

https://www.nbcnews.com/science/sci...s-threaten-research-stirring-panic-rcna191744



In the wake of the Second World War, US leaders adopted the view that scientific progress is an “essential key to our security as a nation, to our better health, to more jobs, to a higher standard of living, and to our cultural progress”. And for the next eight decades, government officials on both sides of the political aisle agreed to invest in US science. Just one month into the second administration of Republican President Donald Trump, scientists fear that that long-time consensus is disintegrating.

Acting with unprecedented speed, the administration has laid off thousands of employees at US science agencies and announced reforms to research-grant standards that could drastically reduce federal financial support for science. The cuts form part of a larger effort to radically reduce the government’s spending and downsize its workforce.

Although US courts have intervened in some cases, Republicans in both chambers of the US Congress — which largely blocked Trump’s efforts to cut science funding during his first term as president from 2017 to 2021 — have mostly fallen in line with the agenda for Trump 2.0. For many researchers, this first month signals a realignment of priorities that could affect science and society for decades to come.
These actions are all “unprecedented”, says Harold Varmus, a former director of the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) who is now a cancer researcher at Weill Cornell Medicine in New York City. “No one has ever seen a [presidential] transition in which one of the most valuable parts of our government enterprise is being taken apart.”

The Trump White House did not respond to Nature’s request for comment.
Here, Nature unpacks the Trump team’s blazing-fast actions on science so far (scroll to bottom to see timeline ‘Science impacts: one month of Trump 2.0’) and talks to policy watchers about what’s next.
 
Sadly, for a certain percentage of these people, not even having their face eaten off will cause them to change their minds. @LogGrad98 recently told a story about a MAGA family member who was purchasing yet another new vehicle. Two pts:

1. Kinda destroys the whole argument that Biden’s economy was some depression level hellscape. If you’re able to blow hundreds of thousands on new trucks, you’re not hurting financially. “bUt EgGs!”

2. Despite being told by Log that Trump’s idiotic economic policy sucked, the guy likely will never ever ever admit that voting for Trump and not Harris was a mistake. He’ll never admit that liberals were right. He’ll never admit that his life and millions of others would’ve been better off with Harris’s economic policies. Trump has become too much of his identity. Trump/hating the left has become the only identity many in this country have.
 
Obviously, intellectually lazy posters saying things like that is just a way of avoiding unpleasant truths.

“Karens” from the world of science:

https://www.nbcnews.com/science/sci...s-threaten-research-stirring-panic-rcna191744



In the wake of the Second World War, US leaders adopted the view that scientific progress is an “essential key to our security as a nation, to our better health, to more jobs, to a higher standard of living, and to our cultural progress”. And for the next eight decades, government officials on both sides of the political aisle agreed to invest in US science. Just one month into the second administration of Republican President Donald Trump, scientists fear that that long-time consensus is disintegrating.

Acting with unprecedented speed, the administration has laid off thousands of employees at US science agencies and announced reforms to research-grant standards that could drastically reduce federal financial support for science. The cuts form part of a larger effort to radically reduce the government’s spending and downsize its workforce.

Although US courts have intervened in some cases, Republicans in both chambers of the US Congress — which largely blocked Trump’s efforts to cut science funding during his first term as president from 2017 to 2021 — have mostly fallen in line with the agenda for Trump 2.0. For many researchers, this first month signals a realignment of priorities that could affect science and society for decades to come.
These actions are all “unprecedented”, says Harold Varmus, a former director of the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) who is now a cancer researcher at Weill Cornell Medicine in New York City. “No one has ever seen a [presidential] transition in which one of the most valuable parts of our government enterprise is being taken apart.”

The Trump White House did not respond to Nature’s request for comment.
Here, Nature unpacks the Trump team’s blazing-fast actions on science so far (scroll to bottom to see timeline ‘Science impacts: one month of Trump 2.0’) and talks to policy watchers about what’s next.
It’s easier to just regurgitate the propaganda than critically think or show empathy. Trolls on this website are those *** clowns that never grew up sitting in the back of the classroom making farting noises with their armpits.
 
Activist judges? lol. They're saying that judges have no authority to interfere with who Trump wants to deport (which is false). Trump is acting as judge, jury, and executioner. They're saying they don't need due process. Trump decides who's a criminal. He deports whoever he wants. Laws are irrelevant.

I thought you were capable of introspection given your previous comment. I appear to have been mistaken.
Process, rule of law, and evidence matters. Donald is deporting people he doesn’t like by declaring them terrorists. Where’s the evidence? Why should we believe a serial liar and rapist? What has Donald done to earn our trust? Aren’t we supposed to follow laws and process? Or are we just ruled by whatever orange god king says?

I hope our “very principled like totally not maga” conservatives remember that what’s good for the goose is good for the gander. I certainly hope and pray that President AOC doesn’t decide to deport a whole bunch of lazy *** “very principled like totally not MAGA” losers from Florida to the gulag without process for being “terrorists.” I sure would lose a lot of sleep if President AOC decided to throw laws out the window and deported her perceived political enemies.

Remember folks, laws and process should matter before it touches you personally. If you wait to care about process or have empathy for others, it might just be too late. In fact, there’s a famous poem about this sort of thing!!! Maybe instead of banning books we should read them?! What a concept.
 
Back
Top