It's not an either or. I definitely think the FO is making this type of assessment, or trying to. It's not all about developing stars. It can't be, teams need role players as much as they need stars, as the Suns, Lakers and other have discovered to their detriments and OKC has discovered to its benefit. My question is whether thrusting young players into central roles and denuding the team of active, quality veterans is an effective way to assess a player's potential to be a solid, contributing role player on a winning team. Maybe it is. At least I think it's a valid question.