Question for Mormons

[Deleted member 848]

then you tell me why you were so set-off by my post.

The interaction was between Spazz and myself, and we worked it out with allegedly no hard feelings in less than 3 posts. Why do you, Trout, and PKM have a problem? this is especially interesting since you three claim to be so neutral and differently religious (and, therefore, to have less on the line personally)

Well if you're reading Spazz's posts literally, then I suppose that this can be determined. Personally, I am gonna call the smallest shred of doubt to the literal interpretation of Spazz's acceptance of zero hard feelings.

 

[ema]

Btw, who will determine the winner? Should we vote?

 

[Dr. Jones]

then you tell me why you were so set-off by my post.

The interaction was between Spazz and myself, and we worked it out with no hard feelings in less than 3 posts. Why do you, Trout, and PKM have a problem? this is especially interesting since you three claim to be so neutral and differently religious (and, therefore, to have less on the line personally)

I was SILENT until you complained that no one was addressing YOU. I stated that I did so out of respect .. you pushed and a few obliged.

 

[Dr. Jones]

so your point was that "allegedly" can be taken in a multitude of ways, right? You were demonstrating its negative usage.

Is it conceivable that it I meant it differently?

Or, you can forget this question and ask yourself and your other cronies, Does it even matter since it transpired between Spazz and NAOS and they seemed to move on pretty quickly?

Did anybody catch the part where I said I prefer Mormon cosmology over some other Christian narratives? Or are we still operating under the assumption that I've been a whitewashing ******* victim, like Trout says. I know we have to listen to what he says.

I already said I thought you meant it light-heartedly .. and even if I'm wrong, no biggie. I don't get mad because people don't subscribe to my belief system.

 

[NAOS]

I was SILENT until you complained that no one was addressing YOU. I stated that I did so out of respect .. you pushed and a few obliged.

this is well beyond ridiculous.

I only said that because you claimed I had been far more derogatory to others beliefs than they had been to mine. I challenged that by asking you to prove it.

 

[TroutBum]

I really only got involved because I'm a jerk.

 

[NAOS]

@ PKM: but, we're cool.

I understand you now. Repp'd if I had any.

 

[franklin]

The interaction was between Spazz and myself, and we worked it out with no hard feelings in less than 3 posts.

This.

Why do you, Trout, and PKM have a problem? this is especially interesting since you three claim to be so neutral and differently religious (and, therefore, to have less on the line personally)

It looks to me like they're incorrectly assuming you're atheist. Thus, your post must have been a shot at religion rather than the valid discussion point it is after changing assumptions regarding the messenger.

Allegedly from atheist = Christ ain't real you dummy.
Allegedly from theist = we don't know how much of that stuff is real and how much is myth or outright falsified.

 

[franklin]

p.s. Trout, taterboob = Cyrone Torbin. Sorry for the let down.

 

[CONAN]

I made one guess (and noted it as a guess) based off a pattern. That is not speaking for you.

I disagree. Time will tell.

 

[Dr. Jones]

This.



It looks to me like they're incorrectly assuming you're atheist. Thus, your post must have been a shot at religion rather than the valid discussion point it is after changing assumptions regarding the messenger.

Allegedly from atheist = Christ ain't real you dummy.
Allegedly from theist = we don't know how much of that stuff is real and how much is myth or outright falsified.

You didn't read enough of the thread, obviously .. as it was no leap, whatsoever, to assume atheist. I never bashed him for that, once .. I jumped on him a couple times for coming off that that, in itself, makes him intellectually superior. Just as I would jump on a Christian for coming off that they are somehow superior simply because of which way they believe.

 

[CONAN]

I talked down to Conan. We have a history of talking smack.

Huh?