What's new

Official 2012 Presidential Election Night Thread

Not really. I'd say they are about the same.

They won't even let cancer patients smoke weed because of some dumbass moral reasoning. They have dry counties. They won't let gays get married. They are the absolute worst when it comes to letting people do what they want. Unless it involves guns, then hey, open season.
 
The American people by a clear majority have rejected traditional family value

Thank Jesus. Too bad it couldn't of come sooner.

Actually, this whole post makes me laugh.

In the afterglow of Obama’s victory, Ayman al-Zawahiri, Ayatollah Khamenei, Vladimir Putin and Chris Matthews, as well as millions of pot-heads, sodomites, pro-aborts and all common moochers, are sharing a collective thrill. The American people by a clear majority have rejected fiscal responsibility, energy independence, national security, border security, traditional family values, and worst of all, standing with the most defenseless and innocent among us. Barack Obama’s re-election is a complete political, economic, moral, social and spiritual catastrophe.


It's like this whining puss put every idiotic stereotype they could come up with. "Derp de der, the Muslims and commies and potheads and gays all banded together to rally against us awesome, magnificent god fearing moral people!" What's sad is I think they actually believe that crap up there. No wonder they got their asses kicked in the election. Sure this panders to the idiots in the bible belt, but guess what geniuses, you already had that vote locked up. It's like the right doesn't get how the electoral college works, and thankfully, the bible belt only has so much influence in this country.

That being said, excuse me while I light up a joint, go to the grocery store and load up on food with my food stamp card, take my gf to get an abortion, have sex with my real bf on the side, and bow down and pray to Allah before the sun goes down.
 
They won't even let cancer patients smoke weed because of some dumbass moral reasoning. They have dry counties. They won't let gays get married. They are the absolute worst when it comes to letting people do what they want. Unless it involves guns, then hey, open season.

I'm sorry, can you go back and find where I said they didn't want any of the above?

No worries, I'll wait.
 
I'm sorry, can you go back and find where I said they didn't want any of the above?

No worries, I'll wait.

No, you said "Not really. I'd say they are about the same. "

I did have to infer who the "they" were, so the inference is that it was people not from the bible belt. Using the inference I just laid my case out why I disagree with it.
 
No, you said "Not really. I'd say they are about the same. "

I did have to infer who the "they" were, so the inference is that it was people not from the bible belt. Using the inference I just laid my case out why I disagree with it.

"They" is the right and left. They both want to control you in different ways.
 
Fair enough. I would argue that when it comes to the right, at least the social conservatives, they want to control you by using prison as a device more than the left does, but I guess at that point the argument is just about degrees.
 
Fair enough. I would argue that when it comes to the right, at least the social conservatives, they want to control you by using prison as a device more than the left does, but I guess at that point the argument is just about degrees.

The right wants to out law more things and say what you can and cannot do and the left wants you to be dependent on them thru "social programs". Both are very much froms of control.
 
The right wants to out law more things and say what you can and cannot do and the left wants you to be dependent on them thru "social programs". Both are very much froms of control.

The left does not want you to be dependent on them, lol. Let me guess, your source on that is the same source that told you all the polls were wrong abs Romney was going to win.

The left wants programs available to help the people who need help. That does not mean they want people dependent on them.

The right has been attacking labor unions because they support the left. Labor unions are all people who work for a living.
 
The left does not want you to be dependent on them, lol. Let me guess, your source on that is the same source that told you all the polls were wrong abs Romney was going to win.

The left wants programs available to help the people who need help. That does not mean they want people dependent on them.

The right has been attacking labor unions because they support the left. Labor unions are all people who work for a living.

Keep putting your head in the sand salty. It's cute.
 
The left does not want you to be dependent on them, lol. Let me guess, your source on that is the same source that told you all the polls were wrong abs Romney was going to win.

The left wants programs available to help the people who need help. That does not mean they want people dependent on them.

The right has been attacking labor unions because they support the left. Labor unions are all people who work for a living.

Source? How about looking at their policies?
 
... and the left wants you to be dependent on them thru "social programs". Both are very much froms of control.

There have been badly formed social prograqms, certainly, which did act to increase dependence. Which of those programs would you say is active today? What current programs act to increase dependency, and how would you change them to remove that component?
 
Keep putting your head in the sand salty. It's cute.

Source? How about looking at their policies?

Way to completely dodge the point.

So, are you guys saying the right is incorrect, and labor unions don't tend to support the left?

Or are you saying labor unions aren't made up of people who work for a living?

You can't have it both ways. You can't say the left is a bunch of people who refuse to work and just want free stuff, and at the same time say labor unions are spending money to support democratic candidates.
 
Complete BS. But even if it was 100% accurate, they still work for a living.

No one said they didn't work. However try to fire a bad teacher in California. Also SEIU will tell you straight up on their own website that they make more then their non union counterparts. I am not against them making a better wage within reason but then they don't stay within reason. Just ask Ford and GMC.

So yes it is accurate. Even if they are working that was never his point now was it?
 
Back
Top