What's new

Archeologists find David's palace.

Dear Beantown,

As an atheist, I find it odd how so many people are in disbelief of my disbelief. As others have already noted almost everyone(excluding the Alltheist) rejects 90% of religious teaching. So please don't make comments that imply that I am stupid for not believing in your god.

I'm not going to try and convince you that there are flaws in the bible or that god doesn't exist because I respect your right to believe what you want. Please respect, mine.

P.S. I made up the term Alltheist

When did I say Atheists were stupid for not believing in God or believing in the Bible?


I said I found it hypocritical when Atheist dismiss the Bible as pure fiction when clearly there is Archeological and historical evidence supporting the Bible.


I never said anything about believing in God or believing the spiritual aspects of the Bible.

How many times do I have to repeat myself?
 

Ah, that random noise they showed for 5 seconds was speech? So I guess you believe that insect chirping you hear at night are outgoing crickets checking out the city's nightlife? A house fly buzzing around your ear is trash talking to you?

The verse states that the ants knew who Solomon was, and moved out of the way not to be accidentally stepped on. If you believe ants have that kind of cognitive ability...
 
Les Miserables is set in a historically accurate time frame of post revolution France in the 1800s. There is archaeological and historical evidence supporting the novel.

So it's not pure fiction, then?
 
Les Miserables is set in a historically accurate time frame of post revolution France in the 1800s. There is archaeological and historical evidence supporting the novel.

So it's not pure fiction, then?

Was the book written to be fiction or non fiction?.............
 
When did I say Atheists were stupid for not believing in God or believing in the Bible?


I said I found it hypocritical when Atheist dismiss the Bible as pure fiction when clearly there is Archeological and historical evidence supporting the Bible.


I never said anything about believing in God or believing the spiritual aspects of the Bible.

How many times do I have to repeat myself?

You're implying that Atheists are too stupid to see the "facts" that are so clear to you.

btw I think most these guys are being way too harsh. I just want mutual respect. I have not attacked your beliefs and I won't.
 
You're implying that Atheists are too stupid to see the "facts" that are so clear to you.

btw I think most these guys are being way too harsh. I just want mutual respect. I have not attacked your beliefs and I won't.

He hasn't "attacked" you in any way. He has every right to ask these questions.
 
I didn't say he attacked me. I think some of the atheists on here are attacking his beliefs.

Aha, nobody is entitled to a protective anti-disagreement belief bubble. Not you, and certainly not him. I don't see any actual aggressive attacks. Mere discussion is perfectly desirable.
 
I don't believe the Bible literally word for word. There are many stories in there that are meant as parables. But what I am saying is that there are many things in the Bible that can be proven historically speaking. Even historians agree there was probably a man named Jesus walking around with disciples preaching. Whether he was literally the Son of God has no importance on this debate.

The debate is I have had many discussions with atheists that totally disregard the Bible as pure fiction. But clearly mankind has been able to prove there are many fact based things in the Bible. The Bible has a huge historical record and is a very important document. So for atheists to laugh or disregard the Bible is hypocritical because it holds many historical truths.
 
Back
Top