What's new
By:

Gonna be riding at Alta next year bros!

I just listened to the Plaintiff's attorneys from Parr Brown talk on a webchat on the Trib. Their arguments were idiotic. If I was the managing partner of that firm I would be really upset that I had attorneys making such a poor argument. It makes their whole firm look like a joke.

I imagine the respondent will get this case summarily dismissed.
 
Just told some bish working drive thru at McDonalds that teh Whopper>>>Big Mac.

She just gave me a blank stare so than I laid this one on here as I sped away...

"The special sauce should just be called sauce, cuz it really aint all that special. Ahahahahahaha" --peels out in convertible Mustang.
 
So here's the thing about forest service special use permits:

Every single one of them has an an annual review, and one of the things in the annual review is the question "does your company provide every reasonable accommodation to the public?" If the company does not reasonably accommodate, they stand a chance to lose the permit.

I know this very well because the company I manage has a forest service special use permit, and the year before I was hired, the company was on probation with the forest service for failing to serve the public, and catering to special interest groups solely.

In this context, with literally every single other ski resort on public land allowing snowboarding, I do not see how alta has any legs to stand on.
 
UGLI baby said:
Just told some bish working drive thru at McDonalds that teh Whopper>>>Big Mac.

She just gave me a blank stare so than I laid this one on here as I sped away...

"The special sauce should just be called sauce, cuz it really aint all that special. Ahahahahahaha" --peels out in convertible Mustang.
Click to expand...

Wrong thread LLMAO.
 
b_line said:
So here's the thing about forest service special use permits:

Every single one of them has an an annual review, and one of the things in the annual review is the question "does your company provide every reasonable accommodation to the public?" If the company does not reasonably accommodate, they stand a chance to lose the permit.

I know this very well because the company I manage has a forest service special use permit, and the year before I was hired, the company was on probation with the forest service for failing to serve the public, and catering to special interest groups solely.

In this context, with literally every single other ski resort on public land allowing snowboarding, I do not see how alta has any legs to stand on.
Click to expand...

I will bet you a sig/avatar for a year this case doesn't win.
 
bigb said:
I will bet you a sig/avatar for a year this case doesn't win.
Click to expand...

I don't know that this case will win, but eventually one will. Alta will not be only skiers for ever, especially if they want to expand onto more forest service land.


Sent from the JazzFanz app
 
b_line said:
I don't know that this case will win, but eventually one will. Alta will not be only skiers for ever, especially if they want to expand onto more forest service land.


Sent from the JazzFanz app
Click to expand...

The forest land is what will kill Alta for skiers.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top