There is No such thing as de-evolution!!! It's all evolution!!
Wrong!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mde7APh5uYY
There is No such thing as de-evolution!!! It's all evolution!!
Actually, they would have used briefs flying stints while mostly running on the ground (even today, many birds live mostly or entirely on the ground), and those brief bouts of flying would still be an advantage (in certain conditions) over things that could not fly at all.
Many of the dinosaurs were very bird-like, and not much transition was needed. Even so, there are many more than two fossils of one species.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_transitional_fossils#Dinosaurs_to_birds
...don't evolutionists believe that ALL dinosaurs disappeared at once, leaving the earth barren of living reptiles.....and then somehow started over again as croc-a-gators out of swamp slime???
No, I don't know any who believe that. I'm pretty sure all of those types of reptiles were around before the KT extinction.
Do you still have your " beautifully designed" wisdom teeth Pearl?
So you see hind declaws in one dog and believe it is design and you see other dog with no hind declaws and believe it is designed as well? Ain't making sense to me at all my friend.
A fair challenge. I was interested in the data on the number of amylase copies in long-established populations with a pronounced difference in diet due to available food.
Here's a question:
I have heard of how some genes are expressed. . .. the proteins they code for being produced. . . . as a result of the presence and inferentially the binding of it to some "trigger" that starts the production.
How do we know that the presence of starch in the diet doesn't cause the genes to be copied or duplicated within the DNA in the first place. It appears to me that you assume something about how the genome regulates itself. .. . assume results like what you cite are "obviously" a matter of statistical chance, when it might be the result of some highly sophisticated design feature of the genetic system. . . .
There is No such thing as de-evolution!!! It's all evolution!!
Now that's an IDesque name.
You can't reasonably explain how the jaw even came about...you start with fish who already has a jaw.
You can't reasonably explain how the skeletal system even came about...you start with fish who already had a skeleton.
You can't reasonably explain how the circulatory system came about...you start with fish who already had a circulatory system.
You can't reasonably explain how the reproductive system came about...you start with fish who already had a reproductive system.
You can't reasonably explain how sexual differentiation came about...you start with fish who were already sexually differentiated.
All of these systems are irreducibly complex. They couldn't have come about by accident.
Creationists believe in variability within kinds. It is designed variation.
..."pretty sure" huh? Well, think again!
Commenting on the new theory and the apparent sudden extinction of the dinosaurs, one science writer admits: “They could shake the foundations of evolutionary biology and call into question the current concept of natural selection.”
Mass extinctions are not merely the cumulative effects of gradual dyings. Something unusual happened.’ [
Dinosaurs appear suddenly in the fossil record, with no links to any ancestors before them. They multiplied greatly, then became extinct.
.....oh, by the way....I'm "pretty sure" about that, too!
I sometimes can't understand if you really sincere in what you are posting or just specifically ignoring and avoiding all the facts about fish evolution, skull evolution, jaw evolution, etc, etc.....
There is numerous scientific theories how most primitive life started on Earth and it does not include intelligent design. We already talked about it, I am so surprised that you keep coming back to it.