What's new
By:

Would you .......

would you trade Jefferson for Bozzer straight up

  • YAY(yes)

    Votes: 4 5.3%

  • NAY(no)

    Votes: 71 94.7%
  • Total voters
    75
Sloany, what do you think about that clip? Is it the exception to the rule or the norm when it comes to Carlos?
 
VINYLONE said:
Sloany, what do you think about that clip? Is it the exception to the rule or the norm when it comes to Carlos?
Click to expand...

Under your ideal scenario, Blatche, a 79% FT shooter this season, either:

A. Scores and makes a free throw (3 Points)
B. Scores and misses a free throw (2 Points)
C. Makes 1/2 FT (1 Point)
D. Makes 2/2 FT (2 Point)
E. Misses 2 FT (0 Points)
F. Boozer blocks him, which is highly unlikely for most players
E. Various other scenarios that include missing a free throw and getting an offensive rebound resulting in more points, of course with Boozer down there, the Wizards getting a rebound is highly unlikely.

Boozer got back on defense, none of the Bulls or Wizards even crossed half court. But you guys point the finger at CARLOS and not any of the other players. The Boozer hate here is INCREDIBLE! A Wizard could have beaten Boozer and got the rebound because it's not an issue of rebounding in that play, it's an issue of speed. Boozer did the right thing. Obviously you all wanted him to run full speed and foul Blatche, but Boozer knew the ****er would miss and got the rebound.


Jokes on you, mata facas!!!!!!!!!
 
Sloanfeld said:
Under your ideal scenario, Blatche, a 79% FT shooter this season, either:

A. Scores and makes a free throw (3 Points)
B. Scores and misses a free throw (2 Points)
C. Makes 1/2 FT (1 Point)
D. Makes 2/2 FT (2 Point)
E. Misses 2 FT (0 Points)
F. Boozer blocks him, which is highly unlikely for most players
E. Various other scenarios that include missing a free throw and getting an offensive rebound resulting in more points, of course with Boozer down there, the Wizards getting a rebound is highly unlikely.

Boozer got back on defense, none of the Bulls or Wizards even crossed half court. But you guys point the finger at CARLOS and not any of the other players. The Boozer hate here is INCREDIBLE! A Wizard could have beaten Boozer and got the rebound because it's not an issue of rebounding in that play, it's an issue of speed. Boozer did the right thing. Obviously you all wanted him to run full speed and foul Blatche, but Boozer knew the ****er would miss and got the rebound.


Jokes on you, mata facas!!!!!!!!!
Click to expand...

You call that getting back on defense? Seriously? shakes Head, walks away.
 
Sloanfeld said:
Wait, come back.

If Boozer didn't get back on defense then how did he get the rebound?
Click to expand...

Jogging behind the guy that stole the ball in lew of actually trying to catch up is not defense. He got lucky and the idiot that had the dunk missed.

Boozer is the only player on the floor in any position to make a defensive play and he did not even try. He was content to jog behind and be ready to inbound the ball. He got lucky, it had nothing to do with defense.

Also if Boozer had not given up on the offensive play the guy defending him may not have been able to make that steal at all.
 
Even though Al hasn't been the 20/10 guy I was hoping for, and even though he drives me insane with not dunking the ball or not taking a step to get an easy layup, I'd still rather have him. He's shown to be pretty tough, he's quite good at the line, his decent low post defense has surprised me considering I've heard that he was just awful, and maybe I optimistically believe that he's still learning the system and will become more effective as the season progresses.
 
Since we traded AWAY Bozzer to trade FOR Big Al, and everyone is happy with the result, why would we want to undo that?
 
Mantis!

Welcome to the board. Do you know Matt aka Yell42. I think he's from Melbourne.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top