What's new
By:

Jazz vs ATL Hawks - 1/5/11 7PM MST

Too easy to overreact to this one. We absolutely stunk, but Atlanta was absurdly hot. You know you're in trouble when the other team doesn't have one cold player. And they did make at least 5 to 8 demoralizing baskets at the end of solid defensive possessions. Ugly game that I'll excuse if we come out angry and thrash Memphis.
 
billyshelby said:
Too easy to overreact to this one. We absolutely stunk, but Atlanta was absurdly hot. You know you're in trouble when the other team doesn't have one cold player. And they did make at least 5 to 8 demoralizing baskets at the end of solid defensive possessions. Ugly game that I'll excuse if we come out angry and thrash Memphis.
Click to expand...

Lots of teams are gonna be hot if you give them wide-open uncontested shots like the Jazz did.
 
This is not your fathers Hawks team. They move the ball, they play defense, they shoot lights out. They're really a joy to watch.
 
zman1527 said:
Lots of teams are gonna be hot if you give them wide-open uncontested shots like the Jazz did.
Click to expand...


This was not unlike the Piston game - only thing is Hawks have better shooters.

Hawks get the "hopper" tag; but to me they're actually watchable. They move the ball around well, take good shots, play decent defense.
 
LifeOnaPlate said:
He looked as bad in the home game vs. Mavs.
Click to expand...

not playing as well lately. DWill was frustrated with him. He was not even really looking for the ball inside. Could have started Fes (not that he had a good game) with them starting Horford and Collins.
 
//r00t 4 Jazz said:
How stupid of me to think records matter
Click to expand...

We started off 12-1 in 2006-07 then had a mediocre record after that. You can't measure this by records.

//r00t 4 Jazz said:
I'm guessing your saying booz was the reason for the slow starts to the season and him missing games is the reason the Jazz finish the season so well
Click to expand...

Boozer haters, just making stuff up as usual.
 
Sloanfeld said:
Boozer haters, just making stuff up as usual.
Click to expand...
I was being sarcastic when I said that and too this day I do not "hate" Booz never have, I was tired of people (mostly you) bringing his name up time and time again even though he is no longer on the team, the Jazz and most fans have moved on, oh and with the Jazz loss I was grumpy enough to respond.

Now why aren't you in the Memphis thread questioning why Millsap has been destroyed by Randolph 2x this week or some other Jazz player(s) poor performance.
 
//r00t 4 Jazz said:
I was being sarcastic when I said that and too this day I do not "hate" Booz never have, I was tired of people (mostly you) bringing his name up time and time again even though he is no longer on the team, the Jazz and most fans have moved on, oh and with the Jazz loss I was grumpy enough to respond.

Now why aren't you in the Memphis thread questioning why Millsap has been destroyed by Randolph 2x this week or some other Jazz player(s) poor performance.
Click to expand...

So it's annoying when I talk about Boozer but it's fine for people to keep taking about Matthews? The hypocracy on this board is pathetic.
 
Sloanfeld said:
So it's annoying when I talk about Boozer but it's fine for people to keep taking about Matthews? The hypocracy on this board is pathetic.
Click to expand...
There is a little talk about Mathews and it does bug me but not as bad it depends on the person and why they're talking about him, also I'm sure you will admit that the position that Mathews plays (SG) is much more of a weakness with this current Jazz team.
But again I don't like all the Mathews talk either especially people pretending they thought matching that contract was a good idea back in the summer.

So to cut this short both Booz and Mathews everybody understands they're good players, but both got contracts Jazz fans mostly agree where too high BUT for different reasons. Booz cause of defense and injuries (and some will say the drama and all that other crap I'm just talking basketball) while with Mathews it was too small of a sample size to give that large of a contract to (again keeping out all the non basketball stuff, his story of not being drafted and how he was a fan favorite etc.).
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top