uhhhmmmmm. . . . .
. . . . .
I think I may have made you uncomfortable.
Do we have to create labels to create some artificial sense of "identity". We are human. Why create all kinds of "sorts" of humans and make a fuss about our differences?
I've never seen a bull all strung out with self-hate, or apprehensions of what others might think.
Cowboys, when they see two bulls doing some kind of unusual play, call it "Balling around". You don't fundamentally change your nature by having a different sort of idea about what is "fun".
Some scientists have looked for some kind of statistically-significant measure of sexuality. One finding is that phytoestrogens in food containers like pop bottles, the plastic lining inside steel cans, , and a lot of other plastics have caused measureable changes in male distinctions from females on several morphological features.
Somebody tell me, please, why we eat foods full of estrogens and then call it "natural" that men are effeminate?
Estrogens and their agonists, testosterone, determine a lot of things in human development, including differences in brain structures, smell and color centers that dominate our likes, dislikes, preferences, and such.
Also, somebody please tell me why behavior or "comfort zones" in relationships, call for differences in legal standing before the law. Let alone call for new labels we can argue about with one another.
The bovines don't bother with any of that. You are what you are. It's that simple.
a cow is a cow. A bull is a bull.
Well, I am human, for better or worse, and you stated that you "kinda like that the bulls screwing bulls" is a better life.. loosely interpreted.
I'm sorry, I am not a fun-loving bull.. I am human. And my "ummmmm" was about whether we can make life as simple as a cow when, in my opinion, God gave us our capacity.