Recent content by NAOS_pt2

Bloody double negatives got teh best of you

Prolly Biden

Going on record here: I hate when people call Key a chucker. Let the dude grow and breathe. And we have no idea what Hardy was telling him to force/try.

The Cavs had plenty of fight. Pretty hard to overcome the loss of Allen on the defensive side. In the minutes I saw, the Celtics hunted Garland a lot, and there was nobody behind him (Mobley was pretty unimpressive on the defensive side when I was watching). Also pretty hard to overcome all of...

he's 45 yrs old, guis.

ANT is playing pretty awesome defense in key, game-planned situations. The difference between him and Mitchell looks pretty ****ing enormous on that side of the ball… to me at least.

Chet has gotta get on that list. He’d be nasty with Lauri.

I’m still ride-or-die with Gobert. Wolves in 6.

People say the dumbest **** when they’re talking about sports.

Whatever DL might’ve said with damn mouth, his Cultural Era ended with him and Quin flinging poo at one another.

I’m actually not sure what y’all are debating about. I just can’t stand for any judgment that’s based on all-star appearances, so I jumped in. If a set of reliable stats indicate that a player is top-20 or top-30, then that means a lot more, imo.

Mods, pls move this to the John Collins thread

Anybody have any advanced stats on Ingram’s defense? iirc, A few years ago, he graded out pretty miserably.

Rudy had won DPOY and was guiding his team into the playoffs before he was an all star.

I'm not trying to be pedantic here, but what exactly do you mean by "the story"? For me, the story is generally one about emphasizing offensive development over a period of the season when the team had a full complement of players (as opposed to a tanking complement of players). I'd be curious...