I don’t really see Exum and Hendricks as similar at all…even if they end up at a similirish endpoint. Exum was raw, but had the tools to become a star player. It wasn’t a likely outcome, but he had some foundation there where you could be convinced he might be a strong primary ball handler in the future. The biggest part of Exum’s draft profile was his mystery anyways…I don’t think there was much mystery with what we were getting with Taylor.
Hendricks is a totally different prospect. The reason you like him is because it’s so easy to see him filling in a role, and that role is valuable. He demonstrated concrete skills which should translate well. But I really don’t see him as a high potential prospect. Watching him at UCF….it was very difficult to imagine him being some kind of star player with his skill level and feel for the game.
I guess it depends on what we mean by “star” or “really good” or any other semi-ambiguous term. Just gonna say I’d be really shocked if TH is ever an above average usage player. You can still be super effective without being a plus usage guy though.
Hendricks is a totally different prospect. The reason you like him is because it’s so easy to see him filling in a role, and that role is valuable. He demonstrated concrete skills which should translate well. But I really don’t see him as a high potential prospect. Watching him at UCF….it was very difficult to imagine him being some kind of star player with his skill level and feel for the game.
I guess it depends on what we mean by “star” or “really good” or any other semi-ambiguous term. Just gonna say I’d be really shocked if TH is ever an above average usage player. You can still be super effective without being a plus usage guy though.