2020 Presidential election

[fishonjazz]

To answer your questions. Yes, I believe she would do every single one of those things and more if it would help her or she was capable of pulling any of them off.

At least with her its still in question. Maybe she will surprise you.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app

 

[Beer]

Serious question: Do you believe the USA will be better off under Trump or Biden?

Honest answer. I think Biden will possibly be able to keep things as is, which is obviously not great, but I'm hopeful he won't make things worse. That being said, the main point of my original arguments are 1. How the god damn mother **** did we end up with Biden and Harris? Like jesus christ, those 2 rose to the top? What a joke. This has never been about Trump. He is a terrible president and is a moron. This has been about the Dems doing everything in their power to suck as bad as possible and hand Trump another 4 years.

 

[Beer]

At least with her its still in question. Maybe she will surprise you.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app

Nah, she's already shown who she is over the past 20 years. She's as scummy as they come. She won't succeed at doing terrible things, but she'll sure as hell try.

 

[Beer]

This video sums up my feelings pretty damn well. Just replace the name Rahm Emanuel with Joe Biden and Kamala Crappy. It still fits perfectly.

 

[NAOS]

Honest answer. I think Biden will possibly be able to keep things as is, which is obviously not great, but I'm hopeful he won't make things worse. That being said, the main point of my original arguments are 1. How the god damn mother **** did we end up with Biden and Harris? Like jesus christ, those 2 rose to the top? What a joke. This has never been about Trump. He is a terrible president and is a moron. This has been about the Dems doing everything in their power to suck as bad as possible and hand Trump another 4 years.

It’s also been a lot about your purity.

 

[fishonjazz]

Nah, she's already shown who she is over the past 20 years. She's as scummy as they come. She won't succeed at doing terrible things, but she'll sure as hell try.

Or she will surprise you. Past behavior isn't always indicative of future behavior.

If you were to look at me 15 years ago and how I behaved then vs me today you would think I was a totally different person. People change sometimes.

Also, perhaps she is willing to do a lot of scummy crap to reach her goal of being president but once she reaches that goal then maybe she wont need to do scummy stuff anymore as she would be at the pinnacle and her goals would have been realized.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app

 

[NAOS]

Or she will surprise you. Past behavior isn't always indicative of future behavior.

If you were to look at me 15 years ago and how I behaved then vs me today you would think I was a totally different person. People change sometimes.

Also, perhaps she is willing to do a lot of scummy crap to reach her goal of being president but once she reaches that goal then maybe she wont need to do scummy stuff anymore as she would be at the pinnacle and her goals would have been realized.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app

Kamala is a deal-maker, not an ideologue. Deal-makers can be misinterpreted pretty easily because there are many opportunities for outsiders to think they’ve reached a total peace with the parties at hand—instead of seeing the deal as a very temporary detente, where you lock-in a certain advantage or victory, before running another assault. These are the reasons that Senators used to struggle in national elections: their voting records were too easy to criticize without looking under the hood of the deals/bills themselves. Kamala is doubly-unfortunate in this regard because she’s both a Senator and a prosecutor.

Beer is lacking sooooo much info on her, and on each deal she’s made, but that never matters, right?

 

[One Brow]

Nah, she's already shown who she is over the past 20 years. She's as scummy as they come. She won't succeed at doing terrible things, but she'll sure as hell try.

Do you have any specific abuses of power in mind when you say that?

 

[NAOS]

Kamala is a deal-maker, not an ideologue. Deal-makers can be misinterpreted pretty easily because there are many opportunities for outsiders to think they’ve reached a total peace with the parties at hand—instead of seeing the deal as a very temporary detente, where you lock-in a certain advantage or victory, before running another assault. These are the reasons that Senators used to struggle in national elections: their voting records were too easy to criticize without looking under the hood of the deals/bills themselves. Kamala is doubly-unfortunate in this regard because she’s both a Senator and a prosecutor.

Beer is lacking sooooo much info on her, and on each deal she’s made, but that never matters, right?

Now, has Kamala taken on some battles just because her party bosses told her to? Has she been the kind of foot soldier that would do something not out of personal conviction but because of hierarchy? I’d say most definitely Yes. This is why she’s been labeled as an opportunist.

But I do think she’s changed; and I think she remains changeable. Again, she is not an ideologue.

 

[Deleted member 365]

This is certainly going to play well with veterans. I can’t wait to see what kind of bump in the polling this provides!

 

[Avery]

This is certainly going to play well with veterans. I can’t wait to see what kind of bump in the polling this provides!

This story is so ghoulish that I hope it isn’t true.

 

[Deleted member 365]

This story is so ghoulish that I hope it isn’t true.

Why wouldn’t it be? No one has come out and denied it and it fits perfectly in line with something trump would do. Remember when he desecrated the CIA within days of becoming president? Or fired the FBI Director? Sided with Putin over his own IG? Refused to travel to Normandy because of the rain? Did nothing about russian bounties? Frankly, him respecting veterans is less believable