framer
Well-Known Member
I have talked myself into him at 16 if we got a forward with an earlier pick.I know the NSJ stuff is a joke, but he would be an exciting prospect watch grow.
I have talked myself into him at 16 if we got a forward with an earlier pick.I know the NSJ stuff is a joke, but he would be an exciting prospect watch grow.
I'll have to go back but I recall him saying the Jazz themselves were low on Cam because he had a bad workout here. Maybe he's getting his wires crossed or I am.Should note that is what he's getting from the around the league. He was pretty specific about that.
I was told Cam blew people away for his Utah workout, but yeah I heard Andy say something a bit contrary to that, so no idea.I'll have to go back but I recall him saying the Jazz themselves were low on Cam because he had a bad workout here. Maybe he's getting his wires crossed or I am.
I have my own thoughts about how this is playing out but I'd rather not jinx it.
a few days ago, maybe a week ago, somebody mentioned we had 15k posts in this thread and wondered if we could get to 17k by draft time. only about 470 to go. i think we get there.
as somebody who is wary of all three, i agree 100%. the only thing i can think of in terms of why you'd like the twins more than bilal is the idea that they are better with the ball. though having said that, bilal is the much better defensive prospect.Teams in the top 8 are definitely having the....."why are we so high on the Twins but not Bilal" conversation right now. If Asuar had a bad workout with ORL, for example, but they might just say **** it we'll take Bilal instead. The case for the Twins is all hype, not saying it won't be justified, but it is all hype.
He tells the truth, but because he does that I'm pretty sure he has a somewhat frosty relationship with the organization. I'm almost surprised he was on Locked on and doubt that would happen if Locke was actually hosting. I just get the sense that there is serious friction between homers and mouthpieces in the media and Andy because he's willing to actually be critical (and truthful) rather than varnishing everything.you should be skeptical of any report like this that comes from anybody not named woj or shams. even more skeptical if it's a local guy. in words, and i like larsen, but he has no damn clue.
And/But Roberson worked because he was playing next to a two MVPs and a floor-spacing big.median outcome is andre roberson - dude was a full time starter for three years in the league. that is no joke. elite defender with length and athleticism who you keep around for a while because of his defense, but ultimately you realize playing 4 on 5 on one end of the court just doesn't work great.
if he learns to shoot, he surpasses a guy like Roberson. if he doesn't, he's probably not THAT great defensively and never becomes a three year starter.