What's my bias? Calling Gobert a top 20 player when ESPN just ranked him as the 18th best player? If I'm stroking him it's only as much as the rest of the knowledgeable NBA viewer does. You just come on here and try to downplay his ability/impact because you're a weirdo who decided since Gobert got traded it means you should hate on him (remember the Eurobasket thread when you felt the need to downplay Gobert's impact while he was dominating. You're a weirdo)
Or is it my bias calling KAT a top 20 player when ESPN just ranked him 13th?
Or is it my bias when I called ANT a potential top 20 player when ESPN ranked him 25th?
Or is it my bias calling Chris Finch one of the best coaches in the NBA when he's in the top 3 of any gambling site for betting favorite for Coach of The Year?
Utah never had this level of talent or level of potential talent on their roster. Utah just had a more proven proof of concept. The only argument the Wolves finish lower than 4th is they get off to a slow start because of the learning curve that could come w/ the Gobert acquisition, but like you said yourself, they have a cupcake schedule early to get to know each other.