What's new

2025 Playoffs Chat & Chill Thread

It's not uncommon for teams to experience a few years of playoff flameouts before they break through, while tinkering around the edges, or otherwise keep a core in place. I guess the question is who's the "core" at Cleveland? I say Mitchell and Mobley definitely. Garland and Allen less so. We'll see.

I am very skeptical that any team can win the title with Mitchell as the #1 option. Sooner or later, he'll suck the balance out of the offensive flow and it becomes too Mitchell centric. He's not shown that he can be reliable in this role.
Plus he plays no defense. Not that he's defensively limited like Steph, he chooses not to play defense, which is severely worse. Steph at least puts in some effort. A player with limited skills who tries will always be preferable to a player with skills who makes no effort. Mitchell is the latter and it will always torpedo the team when the game or series is on the line. At least the player making an effort will be like the blind squirrel who will find a nut now and then. But the player that doesn't try is just purposely avoiding the nuts scattered all around them, when even just picking up one or two of them could make the difference and win the game.
 
It’s kind of fascinating to see two teams in the East that are likely going to make the finals that are unconventional teams built through unconventional means. It’s way harder in the West, but the Jazz should be paying close attention to how these teams go about their business.
 
Plus he plays no defense. Not that he's defensively limited like Steph, he chooses not to play defense, which is severely worse. Steph at least puts in some effort. A player with limited skills who tries will always be preferable to a player with skills who makes no effort. Mitchell is the latter and it will always torpedo the team when the game or series is on the line. At least the player making an effort will be like the blind squirrel who will find a nut now and then. But the player that doesn't try is just purposely avoiding the nuts scattered all around them, when even just picking up one or two of them could make the difference and win the game.
Why do I get the feeling you’ve used the squirrel and nuts example with your subordinates before in numerous mentoring sessions?
 
It’s kind of fascinating to see two teams in the East that are likely going to make the finals that are unconventional teams built through unconventional means. It’s way harder in the West, but the Jazz should be paying close attention to how these teams go about their business.
I'm semi-convinced that because these strategies don't have a nice, tidy label a lot of people will be convinced that these strategies can't work because they aren't real strategies. One thing "tanking" has going for it is that it has a simple label that encompasses a simple, easy-to-understand process.
 
After the recent report that Kerr benched him for looking off Steph multiple times in their game against the Blazers, I want nothing to do with him. Even if he develops into a great offensive player, the kind of mindset you must have to look off the GOAT shooter is a massive red flag.

I want guys who do the right things... at least when the right thing is that freaking obvious.
Eh, I'm just not a grudge holder and believe everyone makes mistakes and deserve another chance at redemption. Especially young folks who made the wrong play in one game, which seems a pretty minor offense to me, but to each their own.

Sent from my OPD2203 using Tapatalk
 
It’s kind of fascinating to see two teams in the East that are likely going to make the finals that are unconventional teams built through unconventional means. It’s way harder in the West, but the Jazz should be paying close attention to how these teams go about their business.
Agreed. I remember a time when we were a pretty well-run organization that other teams aspired to. My how the mighty hath fallen. I don't think we've been a truly well-run organization in nearly 2 decades. We got lucky with some draft picks, but that isn't the same thing.
 
Eh, I'm just not a grudge holder and believe everyone makes mistakes and deserve another chance at redemption. Especially young folks who made the wrong play in one game, which seems a pretty minor offense to me, but to each their own.

Sent from my OPD2203 using Tapatalk
Do you think Kerr benches him for 1 time violation? Dude sat out until Butler injury forced him back to rotation.

Looking off a guy is disrespect. If JC looks off Cody thats one thing, but to look off Steph you gotta be a moron.
 
It’s kind of fascinating to see two teams in the East that are likely going to make the finals that are unconventional teams built through unconventional means. It’s way harder in the West, but the Jazz should be paying close attention to how these teams go about their business.

I would argue that building a team like the Knicks and Pacers did is ENTIRELY the conventional, most reproduceable way to build a team.
 
Do you think Kerr benches him for 1 time violation? Dude sat out until Butler injury forced him back to rotation.

Looking off a guy is disrespect. If JC looks off Cody thats one thing, but to look off Steph you gotta be a moron.
I was just going off what you said.
Anywho there was this dude name Kobe that raped someone, and a dude named Malone who did some stuff with a young girl and didn't take care of his many kids and many other dudes with some serious transgressions on and off the court.
I'm willing to give a dude who looked off a teammate a second chance as I dont see that as an unforgivable sin that can't be corrected going forward but like I said, to each their own. For you that is unforgivable and behavior that is permanent and for me it's forgivable and may be correctable.
 
It’s kind of fascinating to see two teams in the East that are likely going to make the finals that are unconventional teams built through unconventional means. It’s way harder in the West, but the Jazz should be paying close attention to how these teams go about their business.
What unconventional about them?
 
What unconventional about them?
They both are defensive-oriented teams who developed their star point guard (Brunson / Haliburton) after they acquired them and then built a solid team of role players around them by churning their roster. Both teams became contenders by having “their guy” and then using their resources to build around him quickly.
 
Back
Top