What's new
By:

2025 Playoffs Chat & Chill Thread

I think thiibs made a mistake of not playing towns enough. And this is coming from a towns hater
 
KqWIN said:
Siakam was just an incredible trade for IND. Sometimes you've got to be willing to make a risky move. Trading everyone and tanking is not the only solution.
Click to expand...
Sure. That was not the situation the Jazz were in when they blew it up, just so we’re all very clear.

-The Pacers weren’t passively-aggressively at each others’ throats
-The Pacers weren’t old
-The Pacers had superfluous assets, not down a pick whose protections made it prohibitively difficult to trade anything until 2028 (basically we only had one first and swaps to trade)
-Halliburton is better than anyone we had (fight me)
-The Pacers are not in the Western Conference
 
NUMBERICA said:
Sure. That was not the situation the Jazz were in when they blew it up, just so we’re all very clear.

-The Pacers weren’t passively-aggressively at each others’ throats
-The Pacers weren’t old
-The Pacers had superfluous assets (not down a pick whose protections made it prohibitively difficult to trade anything until 2028 (basically we only had one first and swaps to trade)
-Halliburton is better than anyone we had (fight me)
Click to expand...

I’m not specifically talking about our situation. Every time a decent team loses, there’s a call for a team to start tanking. As difficult as it may seem to make a good trade or improve on the margins, tanking is incredibly difficult to pull off as well. When it comes to tanking vs making really hard move, I think the former is incredibly overrated.
 
NUMBERICA said:
Sure. That was not the situation the Jazz were in when they blew it up, just so we’re all very clear.

-The Pacers weren’t passively-aggressively at each others’ throats
-The Pacers weren’t old
-The Pacers had superfluous assets, not down a pick whose protections made it prohibitively difficult to trade anything until 2028 (basically we only had one first and swaps to trade)
-Halliburton is better than anyone we had (fight me)
-The Pacers are not in the Western Conference
Click to expand...
Haliburton and Mitchell are on the same level.
 
SoberasHotRod said:
I hope they pull it together.

I think that OKC has the luxury of putting multiple guys on Edwards and playing him straight, and since everyone can play defense they don't have a weak link that the MIN secondary guys can exploit.
Click to expand...
At the beginning of the series, i thought Minny bench will be the + factor and they become the reason why they loose. Others reasons are that Rudy is totally non existent on the offensive side and that their best smart ballhandler is a 38 old PG, Mike. Too many TO. when he sit. It's a bit of funny to see that Mike is +18 after 2 games when all others players are way below 0, despite shooting not well at all. Game 3, we will see if finally , they start to shoot better and if Rudy can contribute more than 3 points par game.

I don't know why Rudy have been so bad offensively all PO ( except game 5 in LA). Getting older, his current personal issues? He has never been a good offensive player but right now the slump is alarming..
 
KAT is such a low IQ defender. Dude cannot avoid dumb fouls and leaves guys open in the paint all the time when he is supposed to play C and overextends to help on the perimeter.

Thibs had enough of that in game 2. Dude played Mitchell Robinson more minutes in the 2nd half than his 2nd best scorer without foul trouble affecting that decission.
 
KqWIN said:
I’m not specifically talking about our situation. Every time a decent team loses, there’s a call for a team to start tanking. As difficult as it may seem to make a good trade or improve on the margins, tanking is incredibly difficult to pull off as well. When it comes to tanking vs making really hard move, I think the former is incredibly overrated.
Click to expand...
Good response

Sent from my OPD2203 using Tapatalk
 
HermanG said:
KAT is such a low IQ defender. Dude cannot avoid dumb fouls and leaves guys open in the paint all the time when he is supposed to play C and overextends to help on the perimeter.

Thibs had enough of that in game 2. Dude played Mitchell Robinson more minutes in the 2nd half than his 2nd best scorer without foul trouble affecting that decission.
Click to expand...
Ya it's a tough one. What you say about kat is true.
Then I watch Robinson over help time and time again and leave open 3 point shooters and then be a liability on offense. I saw one play near the end of the game where Robinson drove towards the hoop (never a good idea for him) and airballed a dunk attempt lol.

I understand why thibs did that but with hindsight I think he should have went with kat

Sent from my OPD2203 using Tapatalk
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top