For someone who hates to say that, you say it a lot.
Its incredibly obvious.
For someone who hates to say that, you say it a lot.
Truth hurts sometimes. Still not enjoyable to say that Sloan's in-game strategy (e.g., substitutions, matchups) sucks. The information that the team doesn't watch game film together further suggests that not only the in-game strategy is subpar, but the game planning is also. It is absolutely preposterous that they don't watch game film together and don't discuss the game together. It makes me skeptical about how much even the coaches watch and discuss strategy together.Double-double, sure. Not 20-10.
For someone who hates to say that, you say it a lot.
With better matchups, these first two games were winnable, despite the double-digit deficits that actually occurred.
Your pithy quips are cute. Meanwhile, I provide substantiation.If I made up a character who said things like this in a fictional world, no one would believe they were real.
Your pithy quips are cute. Meanwhile, I provide substantiation.
Energy and enthusiasm are only part of the equation. It is true that poor shooting is a problem that is only partially fixable by watching game film. But Deron didn't impulsively throw the ball at Hayward (in front of 19,911 bewildered fans) because of lack of energy; it was because of Hayward not running the offense correctly. And Deron lamented getting off only 11 or 12 shots because of the offense not running well. Watching game film could help that. Not a cure-all. But a help.I'm not sure how watching game film would entice the team to play with energy, enthusiasm. I'm not sure that watching game film would encourage Raja Bell to hit a three.
If Kobe is not a Laker and they still watch all that game film in LA would be considering a threepeat?
I think game analysis and particular looking at game film is important to perfect things but it is so not relevant to what has happened in the first two games.
Just because you proffer general and vague attacks doesn't make them any less untrue--or more interesting. At least you could put some creativity in your inept insults.In order to provide substantiation, one must understand and recognize it. Since you do not demonstrate the latter qualities, the former winds up ineffective.
Just because you proffer general and vague attacks doesn't make them any less untrue--or more interesting. At least you could put some creativity in your inept insults.
In the meantime, we're having a Jazz discussion on this board.
Maybe there's a rant thread on adhominem.com
--or a Tea Party rally in East St. Louis--that might suit you more closely.
InGameStrategy said:It's not that hard to queue up a few plays on a DVD (or have the A/V guys prepare an edited version) to show what a player did well and didn't do well.
In order to provide substantiation, one must understand and recognize it. Since you do not demonstrate the latter qualities, the former winds up ineffective.
Gawd, you must drive the ladies wild in bed.