spycam1
Well-Known Member
I think there's enough talent in Schroeder at #14.
So do I, but I've always had a funny feeling that the Jazz may feel differently. But who knows?
I think there's enough talent in Schroeder at #14.
So do I, but I've always had a funny feeling that the Jazz may feel differently. But who knows?
I'm probably trolling now, but I predict Nerlens Noel's career will end when Enes Kanter posts him up.
Hayward, #14, #21 for Burke.for who? Burke?
Hayward, #14, #21 for Burke.
Insures we are tanking for Wiggins/Parker when we have a lot of unproven offense on this team. You trade Hayward and nobody on this roster would have averaged over 10 points per game last season. I'd do it. In a cocaine addict's heart rate, and so would Cleveland, and so would Charlotte.
Once.
No way. Hayward is better than Burke. I'm not giving up three players for a player that might not be better than any of three I am giving up, especially when you know Hayward can play defense and be an amazing three point shooter in the NBA.
He said more with that one phrase than KOC has said in 10 years!Scratch that..
Lindsey just went on the radio and said "Kevin and I agree that we'll take the player who will be the best OVER THE COURSE OF THEIR CAREER, rather than the positional need".
If we're honest with ourselves, I think Burke is around the #7 spot talent wise, int his draft... so yes #4 would be a stretch.